<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-07-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3557" />
  <endPage num="3661" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Mineral Exploration</name>
      <text id="200807235a5dbe70644c401f80000067">
        <heading>MINERAL EXPLORATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-07-23">
            <name>MINERAL EXPLORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-07-23T14:35:00" />
        <text id="200807235a5dbe70644c401f80000068">
          <timeStamp time="2008-07-23T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:35):</by>  As a supplementary question arising out of the answer, what amendments are proposed in the redrafting of the Mining Act in relation to legal expenses incurred by landowners? I would ask the minister to bear in mind the tremendous financial pressure that many of our landowners are facing in this environment of declining rainfall.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-07-23">
            <name>MINERAL EXPLORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-07-23T14:36:00" />
        <text id="200807235a5dbe70644c401f80000069">
          <timeStamp time="2008-07-23T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (14:36):</by>  I think it is important that, if we are to have the benefits that a mining boom can bring to this state, we need to make sure that we do have access to land, at least particularly for exploration purposes. I certainly do not support any weakening of that right. What is important is that we get all the information so that we can make a good decision.</text>
        <page num="3561" />
        <text id="200807235a5dbe70644c401f80000070">As the member mentioned, exploration is of itself generally a very low impact activity but, of course, what exploration can do is indicate the value of any mineral deposit, and I would think that any restriction to access for that purpose would be undesirable. However, of course we need to mix the rights of landowners, and I believe that the current act is generally sufficient in relation to its protection. I do not wish to go into any particular detail in relation to what we may or may not do at this stage.</text>
        <text id="200807235a5dbe70644c401f80000071">Let me also add that it is not just the traditional mining operations that we see at Olympic Dam and Prominent Hill and places like that, because the Mining Act also covers quarrying. Quarrying has, for a long time, been an activity that is carried out fairly close to human habitation because quarry materials are, of course, low-value but also absolutely essential for road and house construction. It is important to keep living costs low so that we do have access to quarry materials fairly close to human habitation.</text>
        <text id="200807235a5dbe70644c401f80000072">That is why most of the issues in relation to access and closeness to high-value land in my experience are really related more to quarrying, and that has been a longstanding problem. One only has to look at the Linwood Quarry, the Stonyfell Quarry, the Golden Grove quarries and other quarries at Salisbury to understand that really they are the most complex issues in terms of managing mining in a built-up area.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>