<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-07-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3557" />
  <endPage num="3661" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Motions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public and Environmental Health Act Regulations</name>
      <text id="200807233377b09f2b1947f890000980">
        <heading>PUBLIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ACT REGULATIONS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2008-07-23T22:22:00" />
        <text id="200807233377b09f2b1947f890000981">
          <timeStamp time="2008-07-23T22:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (22:22): </by> I move:</text>
        <text id="200807233377b09f2b1947f890000982">
          <inserted>That the regulations under the Public and Environmental Health Act 1987 concerning controlled notifiable diseases, made on 1 May 2008 and laid on the table of this council on 6 May 2008, be disallowed.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="3626" />
        <text continued="true" id="200807233377b09f2b1947f890000983">This motion relates to regulations that have been tabled by the government to include effective surveillance to commence, particularly for influenza, to identify an anticipated seasonal epidemic. Influenza is a notifiable disease in all Australian jurisdictions except South Australia, and 'laboratory-confirmed influenza' is included in the draft national notifiable diseases list of the National Health Security Agreement. It is also reportable to the World Health Organisation if the case is from a new serotype. Rotavirus is a notifiable disease in Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory, and New South Wales and Tasmania are planning to do likewise. The vaccine has been included in the national immunisation program.</text>
        <text id="200807233377b09f2b1947f890000984">Essentially the Liberals believe that notification for early detection of a major public health problem should be supported. However, both the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and the AMA are opposed to these regulations. The AMA has stated that it sees no point in unconfirmed cases being reported because, unless the patients are actually tested, the data is of little value and it is just more paperwork for doctors when it is on suspicion only. The College of General Practitioners has a similar argument and also points out that it could have the impact of creating an overload for the Department of Health.</text>
        <text id="200807233377b09f2b1947f890000985">There has been in the past a significant increase in the reporting of salmonella, cryptosporidium, Ross River virus, Q fever, and so on. With the HIV issue, the Stuart McDonald case was badly managed by this government. In 2006 this government opposed the member for Bragg's private member's bill to make staphylococcal infection a notifiable disease. That virus was responsible for infecting 11 babies last year at the Burnside hospital and its most virulent strain leaves victims on antibiotics for life and in some cases with amputations. We recommend that in this case these regulations be disallowed as being inappropriate and adding to the workload for the health system.</text>
        <text id="200807233377b09f2b1947f890000986">Debate adjourned on motion of Hon. I.K. Hunter.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>