<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-07-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3457" />
  <endPage num="3511" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Controlled Substances (Controlled Drugs, Precursors and Cannabis) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="20080703644b9b7015f6474680000162">
        <heading>CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES (CONTROLLED DRUGS, PRECURSORS AND CANNABIS) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20080703644b9b7015f6474680000163">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20080703644b9b7015f6474680000164">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="20080703644b9b7015f6474680000165">(Continued from 7 May 2008. Page 2816.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <startTime time="2008-07-03T12:26:00" />
          <text id="20080703644b9b7015f6474680000166">
            <timeStamp time="2008-07-03T12:26:00" />
            <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (12:26):</by>  It will be no surprise to members that I rise briefly to indicate Family First's strong support for this bill. Drugs are a scourge in the community, and this bill appropriately increases penalties for the cultivation of hydroponic cannabis and places amphetamines in the most serious category of illicit drugs.</text>
          <text id="20080703644b9b7015f6474680000167">It also more appropriately deals with the manufacture and possession of drug precursor chemicals. Right now, the penalties for hydroponic cultivation of cannabis are nonsense. I have criticised, on numerous occasions, the current penalty for growing cannabis for personal use which, regardless of the quantity essentially, is $500, even when hydroponics are involved and even if they are recidivist offenders.</text>
          <text id="20080703644b9b7015f6474680000168">When the street value from five large hydroponic plants can be in the tens of thousands of dollars, a maximum fine of $500 is absolute nonsense, and led me to introduce a private member's bill to substantially increase the penalties. The amendment to section 33K in this bill does not go as far as my bill went. My bill, which passed in this place, increased the penalty to $10,000 or two years' imprisonment. This bill proposes only a fine of $1,000 or imprisonment for six months, but the mention of imprisonment as a possible penalty opens up a wide array of sentencing options for a magistrate, and Family First certainly supports that move.</text>
          <text id="20080703644b9b7015f6474680000169">The fact is that cannabis is a far more dangerous drug than has previously been thought. A study released just a month ago in the American Medical Association's journal <term>Archives of General Psychiatry</term> found that long-term use may cause two important brain structures to actually shrink, and brain scans of cannabis smokers showed smaller hippocampus and amygdala than non-users.</text>
          <text id="20080703644b9b7015f6474680000170">Users scored lower than non-users in a verbal learning task, and about half of the long-term users in the study experienced some form of paranoia and social withdrawal. As many as 34 per cent of Australians have used cannabis at some point, including 81 per cent of male prisoners and 18 per cent of secondary school students; and so, as a legislator, I am very keen to take up the appropriate measures against this drug.</text>
          <text id="20080703644b9b7015f6474680000171">I strongly support the other measures to differentiate the stronger hydroponically grown cannabis, implementation of dosage units and the new penalties regarding precursors. These measures have been advocated by the Australasian Police Ministers' Council and have been requested by the Police Commissioner, so it comes as no surprise to members, I am sure, that Family First supports this measure. This is a good bill, and Family First supports it wholeheartedly.</text>
          <text id="20080703644b9b7015f6474680000172">Debate adjourned on motion of Hon. R.P. Wortley.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>