<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-07-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3457" />
  <endPage num="3511" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Children in State Care Inquiry</name>
      <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000378">
        <heading>CHILDREN IN STATE CARE INQUIRY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-07-03">
            <name>CHILDREN IN STATE CARE INQUIRY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-07-03T14:47:00" />
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000379">
          <timeStamp time="2008-07-03T14:47:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:47):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Correctional Services a question relating to the Mullighan inquiry.</text>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000380">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000381">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  The recently released report of the Mullighan inquiry recommended that the sexual behaviour clinic of the Department for Correctional Services be expanded so that all child sex offenders can attend the program while in custody and at any stage of their sentence. This is the only recommendation of the inquiry that the government rejected. According to the government response to the inquiry, tabled on 17 June, the government rejected this recommendation on the basis that the recommendation was 'not operationally feasible'.</text>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000382">However, the opposition has been advised by people within Correctional Services that the expansion is feasible; in fact, the government has had the proposal costed. Further, on Tuesday, the minister advised an estimates committee of the other place that she would not answer a question on this topic because the proposal was still to be considered by cabinet. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000383">1.&amp;#x9;Does the minister agree with the government's response to the Mullighan inquiry that the expansion of the sexual behaviour clinic is not operationally feasible?</text>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000384">2.&amp;#x9;If the proposal is not operationally feasible, how could it be costed, and what was the cost?</text>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000385">3.&amp;#x9;If the proposal is not operationally feasible, why is cabinet going to consider it nearly two weeks after the government response denied it was feasible?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-07-03T14:48:00" />
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000386">
          <timeStamp time="2008-07-03T14:48:00" />
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO (Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:48):</by>  I will go back and check the estimates hearing as to what question was actually asked of me. Clearly, I took some advice on the floor at the time. In relation to the sex offender treatment program, I do need to remind members opposite that it was this government that introduced the program, and it is this government—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P. Holloway</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000387">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. Holloway:</by>  Yes, 'this' again; exactly.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000388">
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO:</by>  This again; absolutely. It is this government that is continuing to fund this program because—</text>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000389">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000390">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order, the Hon. Mr Wortley! The minister does not need your assistance; she is doing very well by herself.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000391">
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO:</by>  I will remind the chamber again that—</text>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000392">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000393">
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO:</by>  It was indeed this government that introduced the sex offender treatment program. We have made funding available every year because we realise the importance of the program.</text>
        <text id="200807034bec3af9417e4656b0000394">In relation to the recommendation the honourable member talked about, we believe that the treatment works best towards the end of a person's sentence and, of course, there is also maintenance treatment in the community. So, for those very obvious reasons, it is targeted at high-risk offenders, and it works best towards the end of their treatment. It is a very intensive course, and we have been quite open and honest about that. We believe that we need to continue in the way we have been, to target those who are most at risk in order to protect the community from those people.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>