<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-06-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3399" />
  <endPage num="3457" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Emergency Services Centre, Port Lincoln</name>
      <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000439">
        <heading>EMERGENCY SERVICES CENTRE, PORT LINCOLN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="597" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-06-19">
            <name>EMERGENCY SERVICES CENTRE, PORT LINCOLN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-06-19T14:56:00" />
        <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000440">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-19T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="597">The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER (14:56):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Emergency Services a question about the emergency services centre at Port Lincoln.</text>
        <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000441">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="597" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="3427" />
        <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000442">
          <by role="member" id="597">The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER:</by>  Earlier this month, it was brought to my attention in the local press that the council had withdrawn its support for the MFS, CFS and SES centre, which was to be on land at Kirton Point. Council still supports the centre but at a different location. The Chief Executive of Port Lincoln council, Mr Geoff Dodd, is quoted as saying that the state government is not offering any compensation for the land, which has been controlled and developed by council. He said: </text>
        <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000443">
          <inserted>Basically, they can't just ride roughshod over councils, and there may be a bit of a precedent here with ramifications wider than Port Lincoln that, if there are sporting and recreation grounds that councils do look after which are crown land, can the government step in and take them back whenever they see fit for their purpose? I think that communities should certainly be taken into account.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000444">In a letter of reply to the council, the state's Fire and Emergency Services Commission states that there is no statutory entitlement for any community compensation. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000445">1.&amp;#x9;What new site has the minister or her department decided on for this badly needed facility?</text>
        <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000446">2.&amp;#x9;Does she agree that, although there may be no statutory entitlement, there is a moral obligation to compensate communities that have cared for crown land for generations?</text>
        <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000447">3.&amp;#x9;What is she going to do about it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-06-19T14:58:00" />
        <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000448">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-19T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO (Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:58):</by>  The issue of building a new emergency services centre for Port Lincoln has gone on for very many years. Certainly, the government has made its intentions clear for quite some time. The site to which the honourable member refers, where the new emergency services centre will be built, is currently vacant and comprises old asphalt tennis courts that are in a state of disrepair. The site is overgrown with weeds and littered with rubble. As recently as December last year the government was advised that the council supported the use of this land. It is crown land, and it has been rededicated to me by the minister (Hon. Gail Gago). I do not need to emphasise in this place how important the new emergency services precinct is for Port Lincoln, and ensuring the best delivery of emergency services to the Port Lincoln community in the future.</text>
        <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000449">As I said this morning when I was asked a question on radio, the crown land is there for the use of people. We are talking about a piece of disused crown land on which we are building a state-of-the-art emergency services community centre. We are not taking from the community: we are actually giving back to the community, and it is a very important piece of infrastructure for Port Lincoln.</text>
        <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000450">The coronial inquest actually made a comment that, at the moment, emergency services are being delivered in very difficult circumstances. This is something that we recognise, and we have recognised it for several years. We have had ongoing discussions for several years. My priority always is to community safety. Again, this government wants to provide the community of Port Lincoln with a top-class emergency services facility. That has always been the plan, and we have been consulting for many years. So, it is disappointing at this stage to see that compensation is sought for what is, as I said, crown land which is being used for the community.</text>
        <text id="2008061961cd8105c2d442aeb0000451">Certainly, the need to rededicate crown land on a regular basis occurs in emergency services because, in the past, for historical reasons, because the SES and the CFS are community-based agencies, often they have been on crown land under the care of council. So, this is really not at all unusual. I reiterate that this discussion, this debate, has gone on for many years, and my concern is always to see a safer community. I believe that is my duty of care.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>