<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-06-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3399" />
  <endPage num="3457" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Level Crossings</name>
      <text id="20080619e6e5b09cb0084cdda0000352">
        <heading>LEVEL CROSSINGS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-06-19">
            <name>LEVEL CROSSINGS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-06-19T14:26:00" />
        <text id="20080619e6e5b09cb0084cdda0000353">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-19T14:26:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:26):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Road Safety a question relating to railway crossing safety.</text>
        <text id="20080619e6e5b09cb0084cdda0000354">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080619e6e5b09cb0084cdda0000355">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  On 13 May 2007, the Australasian Railway Association wrote to the minister urgently calling for an increase in penalties for breaching road rules at railway crossings, stating that the penalties are ridiculously low and do not reflect the potential for a catastrophic accident that illegal behaviour can cause at level crossings. Earlier this month the association reissued its demand that all jurisdictions follow the lead of Victoria, which the association regards as the benchmark jurisdiction in relation to railway crossing safety. The Victorian fee for a rail crossing offence is $430.</text>
        <text id="20080619e6e5b09cb0084cdda0000356">A recent Australian Transport Safety Bureau report found that in almost every case the primary factor in a rail crossing accident is the failure of the motorist to abide by the traffic controls at the crossing. In South Australia the penalty for failing to stop at a level crossing is $297. In legislation before the council the penalty for failing to notify of a change of address would rise from $250 to $1,250. My questions to the minister are: on what basis does the government consider that failing to notify a change of address is a greater offence than risking lives by breaking the road rules at a railway crossing, and will the minister have the fees reviewed in light of the rail industry's call?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-06-19T14:27:00" />
        <text id="20080619e6e5b09cb0084cdda0000357">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-19T14:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO (Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:27):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. I did receive correspondence last year, as he has mentioned, and I did respond back to—I am trying to remember his name—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. Wade</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080619e6e5b09cb0084cdda0000358">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. Wade:</by>  Mr Nye.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080619e6e5b09cb0084cdda0000359">
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO:</by>  Mr Bryan Nye; that is right—to advise him that expiation fees for level crossing offences, which previously had been between $183 and $223, were increased in line with expiation fees for road intersection offences to $297, and that occurred on 17 December last year. The maximum court-imposed penalty for offences under the Australian road rules, which do include level crossing offences, was increased from $1,250 to $2,500 in April 2007—we are talking about a court imposition now.</text>
        <page num="3421" />
        <text id="20080619e6e5b09cb0084cdda0000360">I should also place on the record that we have a penalty for offences such as reckless and dangerous driving, and reckless and dangerous driving can occur in many different situations. So, there may be occasions where a level crossing offence is committed without reckless or dangerous driving being involved; however, if the police believe the circumstances of the breach constitute reckless and dangerous driving they are able to charge the driver of the vehicle with this offence.</text>
        <text id="20080619e6e5b09cb0084cdda0000361">So, yes, the expiation fee was increased last year, and that was obviously achieved by regulation. We believe there are, at this time, sufficient sanctions, because we have court-imposed penalties and the Australian road rules, which do include level crossing offences. And, yes, police can obviously avail themselves of reckless and dangerous driving provisions and all the permutations that arise from that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>