<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-06-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3247" />
  <endPage num="3318" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Teachers, Industrial Action</name>
      <text id="20080617564551ce26184f4690000383">
        <heading>TEACHERS, INDUSTRIAL ACTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="625" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. SANDRA KANCK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-06-17">
            <name>TEACHERS, INDUSTRIAL ACTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-06-17T15:35:00" />
        <text id="20080617564551ce26184f4690000384">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-17T15:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="625">The Hon. SANDRA KANCK (15:35):</by>  I seek leave to make an explanation before asking the Minister for Police questions about the government's refusal to allow teachers to march down King William Street today.</text>
        <text id="20080617564551ce26184f4690000385">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="625" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. SANDRA KANCK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080617564551ce26184f4690000386">
          <by role="member" id="625">The Hon. SANDRA KANCK:</by>  I read in last Thursday's <term>Advertiser</term> that some marchers between Victoria Square and Parliament House would be banned on the grounds of safety. <term>The Advertiser </term>reported that the ban relates to the tram line extension and safety issues but that major events such as the Christmas Pageant or celebration parades would be exempt from the ban. My office contacted SAPOL for clarification and was told that each request to march was subject to a risk assessment and that they would obviously not close off King William Street for 'three men and a dog'. I understand that, today, something like 8,000 teachers marched—</text>
        <text id="20080617564551ce26184f4690000387">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="625" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. SANDRA KANCK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080617564551ce26184f4690000388">
          <by role="member" id="625">The Hon. SANDRA KANCK:</by>  Was it 10,000? I understand that 8,000 was the police estimate, which is usually an underestimate. A large number of teachers marched today but were refused permission to march down King William Street. Those many thousands of teachers could hardly be placed in the category of 'three men and a dog'. I know that, over the 30 years or so that I have been in rallies from Victoria Square to Parliament House, on a number of occasions when it has been small numbers, we have still marched down, and the police have blocked off just one lane and allowed the other two lanes to continue to travel at a reduced speed. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20080617564551ce26184f4690000389">1.&amp;#x9;Why were the teachers not allowed to march down King William Street today?</text>
        <text id="20080617564551ce26184f4690000390">2.&amp;#x9;Will other political rallies and marches be permitted?</text>
        <text id="20080617564551ce26184f4690000391">3.&amp;#x9;Will other large events that require the closure of King William Street, such as tickertape parades for returning Olympians, a premiership winning Port or Crows team, or soldiers returning from Iraq or some other tour of duty, be permitted?</text>
        <text id="20080617564551ce26184f4690000392">4.&amp;#x9;If these other events are to be allowed, can the minister outline the criteria that will be used to make an assessment about which rallies are to be permitted?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <startTime time="2008-06-17T15:38:00" />
        <page num="3265" />
        <text id="20080617564551ce26184f4690000393">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-17T15:38:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (15:38):</by>  It is not a question for the state government to determine. It is up to the city council to determine what marches happen; it is the council's prerogative. Apparently, as I understand it, the city council seeks the advice of the police. It seeks SAPOL advice on safety and risk, but it is a matter entirely for the city council. If, in fact, the existence of trams has changed the police assessment, I am sure that there are other routes through the city. The May Day procession found an alternative route; so there are alternatives. It is really a matter that the honourable member should take up with the Adelaide City Council because it is its decision.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>