<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-06-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3247" />
  <endPage num="3318" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Urban Land Supply</name>
      <text id="2008061754c43de890ab4e4a80000280">
        <heading>URBAN LAND SUPPLY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-06-17">
            <name>URBAN LAND SUPPLY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-06-17T14:58:00" />
        <text id="2008061754c43de890ab4e4a80000281">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-17T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (14:58):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Can the minister advise whether any new residential development on the urban fringe within an extended urban growth boundary will also be transit-oriented development?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-06-17">
            <name>URBAN LAND SUPPLY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-06-17T14:59:00" />
        <text id="2008061754c43de890ab4e4a80000282">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-17T14:59:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (14:59):</by>  There is obviously a capacity for that. As I indicated last year when asked questions about the extension of the urban growth boundary in the vicinity of Gawler, one of the reasons I gave was that, in relation to Gawler East, for example, in the Concordia area, there is an existing rail line. Obviously, there is the potential at some stage in the future for transit-oriented development in those places as they are ideal. Of course, what we have to do—and this will require multi-million or several billion dollars worth of investment over the next few years—is to electrify the system, so that it will be quick and clean enough to make it attractive.</text>
        <text id="2008061754c43de890ab4e4a80000283">Once the system has been electrified there is then the capacity, of course, for further extension. But, before we can do the electrification we have to replace the sleepers in the system, which, in some cases, go back to the 1950s. That involves several hundred million dollars of investment. All that is happening under the Rann government. This is the transport revolution which will in turn, through planning, lead to a much better, more liveable city.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>