<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-06-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2971" />
  <endPage num="3052" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Stamp Duty</name>
      <text id="2008060361776abb51d34d7b80000223">
        <heading>STAMP DUTY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-06-03">
            <name>STAMP DUTY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-06-03T15:24:00" />
        <text id="2008060361776abb51d34d7b80000224">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-03T15:24:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (15:24):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Leader of the Government, representing the Treasurer, a question about stamp duty relief for first home buyers.</text>
        <text id="2008060361776abb51d34d7b80000225">Leave granted. </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2008060361776abb51d34d7b80000226">
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD:</by>  In its pre-budget submission, the Real Estate Institute of South Australia highlighted a matter I raised in this place on 27 March last year concerning stamp duty relief for first home buyers. In its submission the institute states, 'to improve affordability the concessions offered need to be reviewed and they need to be in line with the median house price.'</text>
        <page num="2985" />
        <text id="2008060361776abb51d34d7b80000227">In the 2004-05 budget, the government raised the threshold for stamp duty relief for first home buyers from $130,000 to $250,000, Treasury stating that the median purchase price for first home buyers in South Australia was $175,000 (based on the 2003-04 first home owner grant data). So, the median price fell somewhere just below the centre of that threshold range at the time that was announced. This offering to first home buyers was said to cost some $10.5 million recurrent per year.</text>
        <text id="2008060361776abb51d34d7b80000228">Since then (and as you would know, Mr President) house prices have risen substantially—some 42 per cent in that time—and, therefore, South Australian families trying to buy their first home are now looking down the barrel of a median $260,000 first home purchase price, with the median price of houses overall at some $330,000. Stamp duty relief for first home buyers now cuts off at $250,000; this is below the median purchase price for first home buyers of $260,000. My questions to the Treasurer are:</text>
        <text id="2008060361776abb51d34d7b80000229">1.&amp;#x9;Given that the assistance threshold cuts off below the median price, has the scheme announced in the 2004-05 budget actually cost $10.5 million recurrent as predicted?</text>
        <text id="2008060361776abb51d34d7b80000230">2.&amp;#x9;In the budget years after 2004-05, why has Treasury failed to report in the budget papers how much this scheme has actually cost?</text>
        <text id="2008060361776abb51d34d7b80000231">3.&amp;#x9;Will the Treasurer actually raise the thresholds again so that they are at least above the median price so as to give genuine tax relief to struggling first home buyers?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <startTime time="2008-06-03T15:30:00" />
        <text id="2008060361776abb51d34d7b80000232">
          <timeStamp time="2008-06-03T15:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (15:30):</by>  I will refer that question to the Treasurer in another place. In relation to the financial disclosure, I understand that part of the funding of first home owner grants is from the federal government, but I will refer the question to the Treasurer and bring back a reply.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>