<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-05-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2705" />
  <endPage num="2818" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Planning Regulations</name>
      <text id="20080507732edc8dff2b491190000357">
        <heading>PLANNING REGULATIONS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="603" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.D. LAWSON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-05-07">
            <name>PLANNING REGULATIONS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-05-07T14:55:00" />
        <text id="20080507732edc8dff2b491190000358">
          <timeStamp time="2008-05-07T14:55:00" />
          <by role="member" id="603">The Hon. R.D. LAWSON (14:55):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Given that the minister considers it imperative that we continue with 300-metre exclusion zones, what steps will the minister actually take to ensure that these zones are marked on the development plans so that the community is aware of them and can act appropriately?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-05-07">
            <name>PLANNING REGULATIONS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-05-07T14:56:00" />
        <text id="20080507732edc8dff2b491190000359">
          <timeStamp time="2008-05-07T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (14:56):</by>  As I have said, first of all we have to identify the existing quarries, because many of them are operated as private mines (in some cases, they pre-date the current operations under the Extractive Industries Rehabilitation Scheme) and some of them are operated by local governments. So, it is not just a simple issue of dealing with the major quarries that come under the Extractive Industries Rehabilitation Fund.</text>
        <text id="20080507732edc8dff2b491190000360">In principle, I certainly agree with the honourable member that it is desirable that we should identify these zones. As I have said, I have asked for some work to be done, but it is quite a complex issue to identify all of those quarries and then have them built into development plans. Historically, it is a matter that has been covered under the Mining Act. Unfortunately, in some areas—for example, parts of Linwood and also the Golden Grove extractive industry zone—the buffer on some boundaries is probably less than 300 metres.</text>
        <text id="20080507732edc8dff2b491190000361">An example of one of the decisions I did take was when we recently extended the urban growth boundary in the vicinity of what was the waste fill area at the Medlow dump, which is a similar sort of issue, when I ensured that, although it had been rezoned, a limitation was put on that area for residential use until that activity had been exhausted. By analogy, it should be the same with quarries; that is, where we have those quarries, we should put in place restrictions until such time as that activity is completed.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>