<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-04-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2481" />
  <endPage num="2572" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000024">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Police, Super Local Service Areas</name>
      <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000025">
        <heading>POLICE, SUPER LOCAL SERVICE AREAS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-04-30">
            <name>POLICE, SUPER LOCAL SERVICE AREAS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-04-30T14:18:00" />
        <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000026">
          <timeStamp time="2008-04-30T14:18:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition)</by> (14:18):  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Police a question about super local service areas.</text>
        <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000027">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="2482" />
        <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000028">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  I have been advised that a project team has been put together within SAPOL to investigate a proposal to realign local service areas to make them more consistent with the current local council boundaries. Apparently, these new areas will be named super local service areas and may be formed next year. A concern was expressed to me that the accessibility of police stations in regional towns may now be compromised if the new boundaries place the nearest station in a different LSA. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000029">1.&amp;#x9;What is the current status of this proposal for super service areas to date?</text>
        <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000030">2.&amp;#x9;Who has SAPOL consulted with on this proposal?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <startTime time="2008-04-30T14:19:00" />
        <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000031">
          <timeStamp time="2008-04-30T14:19:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (14:19):</by>  It is much broader than the honourable member suggests. In fact, the state government some time ago now (more than a year ago, I would have thought) was looking at having common boundaries for government agencies, because there is a great deal of benefit to be gained by having consistent boundaries. As members may know, in many of the regions of this state there are senior public servants who meet regularly to discuss issues. Just as the heads of the Public Service in Adelaide would meet on a state basis so, too, in many of the regional areas there are local heads who meet in relation to regional issues.</text>
        <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000032">There is a good exchange of information between agencies such as SAPOL, emergency services, social welfare, health, and so on. There is a lot to be gained from that. That is why the government through cabinet some time ago in principle supported common government boundaries. I am sure if the honourable member looks on the website he will see that it was announced some time ago. It was always recognised that there would be some difficulties—</text>
        <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000033">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="52">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000034">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> It is not a matter of neglecting communities. In fact, it is giving better service to local communities. It is recognised that the boundary for one government agency will not always be the most appropriate or the best boundary for another government agency. As a result of that decision, a lot of work has been done in relation to the boundaries.</text>
        <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000035">Clearly, there are some anomalies. The boundaries under which police operate will not necessarily be the best boundaries for others. As Minister for Urban Development and Planning I have already exempted SAPOL where there are clear anomalies. For example, in the West Coast, if the anomaly had not been corrected, Port Augusta police would have been responsible for policing part of Flinders Highway south of Whyalla. Clearly, that would be absurd.</text>
        <text id="20080430321972ab838c452390000036">When these situations arise, the boundaries will be adjusted but, generally, the government will try to get common boundaries, so that when a senior police officer in a particular district meets with his Public Service colleagues, whether from health or Aboriginal affairs, and so on, about issues of mutual concern within the area they will be talking about the same jurisdiction. That is the point of it. It is a simple principle. By and large, we want the boundaries to align, but it is recognised that it will not always be possible in every case and when there are anomalies there is provision in the policy to make exemptions.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>