<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-04-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2379" />
  <endPage num="2441" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>WorkCover Corporation</name>
      <text id="2008041086335c3474d7414a90000097">
        <heading>WORKCOVER CORPORATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="603" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.D. LAWSON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-04-10">
            <name>WORKCOVER CORPORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-04-10T14:39:00" />
        <text id="2008041086335c3474d7414a90000098">
          <timeStamp time="2008-04-10T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="603">The Hon. R.D. LAWSON (14:39):</by>  I have a supplementary question. I am well aware that another, more competent minister has responsibility—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2008041086335c3474d7414a90000099">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT: </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="603">
        <name>The Hon. R.D. LAWSON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2008041086335c3474d7414a90000100">
          <by role="member" id="603">The Hon. R.D. LAWSON:</by>  —for the Ambulance Service, but my question is: why is this minister supporting changes which will deprive injured ambulance officers of their entitlements?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2008041086335c3474d7414a90000101">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT: </by> Order! That was part of the original question. I think the minister answered it.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>