<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-03-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2083" />
  <endPage num="2144" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Greater Mount Gambier Master Plan</name>
      <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000136">
        <heading>GREATER MOUNT GAMBIER MASTER PLAN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-03-06">
            <name>GREATER MOUNT GAMBIER MASTER PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-03-06T14:52:00" />
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000137">
          <timeStamp time="2008-03-06T14:52:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (14:52):</by>  I have a supplementary question. My question to the minister did not relate to cabinet decisions: it related to any discussion outside cabinet between the member for Mount Gambier and the minister. I again direct the question to him. What other discussions did he have with the member outside of cabinet in relation to these controversial decisions?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-03-06">
            <name>GREATER MOUNT GAMBIER MASTER PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-03-06T14:52:00" />
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000138">
          <timeStamp time="2008-03-06T14:52:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (14:52):</by>  In relation—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. Lucas</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000139">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. Lucas:</by>  What are you hiding?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000140">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000141">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  In relation to my decision—</text>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000142">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000143">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000144">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  I have absolutely nothing to hide at all. As I said, in relation to the decision, I informed cabinet, but I did not discuss—</text>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000145">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000146">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000147">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  —the ultimate decision prior to that. But, as for all processes for rezoning, if the honourable member was a lower house member, he would be aware that, whenever development plan amendments are made, it is actually a requirement under the Development Act that you consult with the local member. We probably have some members here on the Environment, Resources and Development Committee—</text>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000148">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000149">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000150">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  —who know that, whenever development plan amendments (PARs under the old system) are made, they actually go to the Environment, Resources and Development Committee. One of the items that I send to them is consultation with the local member.</text>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000151">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20080306cea376a6c1d24927a0000152">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  That's right; it has been that way for some years. The views of local members—and Mr McEwen is the local member—are considered as part of the process. What I have to do in my submission to the ERD Committee, when I put it, is to assure the committee that I have consulted with the relevant local members.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>