<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-02-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1639" />
  <endPage num="1699" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Marathon Resources</name>
      <text id="200802137eb25cd0dde54e5880000201">
        <heading>MARATHON RESOURCES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-02-13">
            <name>MARATHON RESOURCES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-02-13T15:30:00" />
        <text id="200802137eb25cd0dde54e5880000202">
          <timeStamp time="2008-02-13T15:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (15:30): </by> I have a supplementary question. Will the minister confirm that Marathon's continued presence in the Arkaroola Wilderness Sanctuary will be limited to clean-up, restoration and removal of equipment and that there will be no drilling and no further mineral exploration?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development and Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-02-13">
            <name>MARATHON RESOURCES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-02-13T15:30:00" />
        <text id="200802137eb25cd0dde54e5880000203">
          <timeStamp time="2008-02-13T15:30:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (15:30): </by> I have already made it clear that there will be no new holes drilled by Marathon. That does have to be completed. It will take a few days for the clean up effort in relation to the sumps, and so on. If drilling is halfway through and the bit is down there, it has to be taken out of the hole. That process will be allowed to continue. After all, if the equipment is there we do not want it left on the side of the hill.</text>
        <text id="200802137eb25cd0dde54e5880000204">We have set a number of objectives or requirements on the company. First, it has to remove the material that has been placed wrongly in those pits. It then has to do a thorough review and report to government in relation to its environmental practices, because the company has other tenements within the state. The government wants to ensure that the company does a thorough review of those practices. As we indicated yesterday in a statement, the company will have to talk to and re-engage with stakeholders, including the Sprigg family (the operators of the resort at Arkaroola), before this government would ever contemplate any further activity by the company in this area.</text>
        <text id="200802137eb25cd0dde54e5880000205">It is up to the company as to what it does now. Certainly, it can undertake any environmental or baseline studies if it so wishes and if it believes they are valuable. In relation to drilling, once the work on the holes it is working on now is completed—and I mean restoring the sumps which are there to collect the material—we expect the drilling rigs would be removed. As I said, there will be no further drilling for an indefinite period.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>