<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-02-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1639" />
  <endPage num="1699" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Wangary Coronial Inquest Working Party</name>
      <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000103">
        <heading>WANGARY CORONIAL INQUEST WORKING PARTY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-02-13">
            <name>WANGARY CORONIAL INQUEST WORKING PARTY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-02-13T14:54:00" />
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000104">
          <timeStamp time="2008-02-13T14:54:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:54):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Emergency Services a question relating to the Wangary Coronial Inquest Working Party.</text>
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000105">Leave granted. </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000106">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  Yesterday, the minister made a ministerial statement regarding the Wangary Coronial Inquest Working Party and its role in ensuring that the recommendations made by the Coroner are implemented. The minister also stated that the CFS has made many changes already following the Smith report and as part of Project Phoenix. </text>
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000107">However, there are a number of recommendations made by the Coroner which are either similar to recommendations of past reports previously declared to have been completed or are repeating similar recommendations yet to be addressed. As an example of recommendations previously identified as completed, I note that Dr Smith's report and Project Phoenix both highlight the need for better integration of private firefighters into the CFS systems and operations, while the CFS claims this recommendation has been completed; and I note that the Coroner has made a similar recommendation. </text>
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000108">In terms of recurring recommendations, I note a series of recommendations which relate to bushfire readiness in national parks. In 2003, cabinet officially endorsed the recommendations of the Premier's Bushfire Summit, including those related to the management of native vegetation and public land, including firebreaks and access tracks in national parks</text>
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000109">Similarly, recommendations were made by the Environment, Resources and Development Committee of this parliament in November 2005, following the Wangary fires and, again, in 2007 by the Coroner in his report on the Wangary fires. The Kangaroo Island bushfires recently burnt 90,000 hectares of land, including 75,000 hectares of national parks, again highlighting the need for better management of vegetation on public land. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000110">1.&amp;#x9;Will the minister broaden the Wangary Coronial Inquest Working Party terms of reference to ensure that they undertake a stocktake of recommendations made in previous reports, including the Premier's Bushfire Summit, and progress made in implementing those recommendations?</text>
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000111">2.&amp;#x9;What will the minister do to ensure that recurring recommendations are finally addressed and resolved?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-02-13T14:56:00" />
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000112">
          <timeStamp time="2008-02-13T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO (Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Road Safety, Minister Assisting the Minister for Multicultural Affairs) (14:56):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. He has already identified that many of the recommendations in the coronial report were already dealt with either by the recommendations of Dr Bob Smith or Project Phoenix. It does not mean, of course, that they were not picked up again at the coronial inquest stage. However, as I clearly outlined yesterday—</text>
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000113">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="62">The Hon. S.G. Wade interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="629" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000114">
          <by role="member" id="629">The Hon. CARMEL ZOLLO:</by>  We are working on them and, as I said yesterday, we have a working party that has already met three times. Different groups of people have been tasked to undertake a body of work as well. The intention is that later everybody will come back together to have a look at what everybody has done and, if there are any issues that need to be looked at, of course, they will be.</text>
        <page num="1647" />
        <text id="200802139eee9fb5ad6b481ab0000115">One of the first things the honourable member said today was in relation to private farm firefighters. Of course, the CFS undertook to prepare a code of practice for private firefighter farmers. I remember being up in the Adelaide Hills the day that code of practice booklet was launched. As I said, that would have been something we would have said earlier had been completed. If there is any aspect of that arising out of the Wangary coronial inquest which we need to improve on or add, then of course we will do so. As I undertook yesterday, I will come back to this parliament and let this chamber know exactly what we have done with all those recommendations.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>