<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2008-02-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1591" />
  <endPage num="1639" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="2008021216ca1bfe3c4a4b40b0000396">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Marathon Resources</name>
      <text id="2008021216ca1bfe3c4a4b40b0000397">
        <heading>MARATHON RESOURCES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2008-02-12">
            <name>MARATHON RESOURCES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2008-02-12T15:47:00" />
        <text id="2008021216ca1bfe3c4a4b40b0000398">
          <timeStamp time="2008-02-12T15:47:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (15:47):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Mineral Resources Development a question about Marathon Resources and the Arkaroola area.</text>
        <text id="2008021216ca1bfe3c4a4b40b0000399">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2008021216ca1bfe3c4a4b40b0000400">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  As we heard today, both via press release and ministerial statement, the government has suspended drilling operations by Marathon at Arkaroola. The news release by the Premier, as read by the minister reads: </text>
        <text id="2008021216ca1bfe3c4a4b40b0000401">
          <inserted>The Premier Mike Rann has announced that the government is suspending indefinitely the drilling operations by Marathon Resources at Mount Gee at Arkaroola in the wake of a significant breach of exploration conditions of that licence.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2008021216ca1bfe3c4a4b40b0000402">It is my understanding that PIRSA has at least six officers authorised by the EPA to carry out inspections and compliance work in relation to environmental breaches by operators within the mining industry. However, in the case of the Marathon Resources breach, the opposition has been informed that the Leigh Creek police made the initial contact investigation, despite South Australian police officers not being adequately trained to do so. Why were the police requested to undertake the initial investigation, and who made that request?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development and Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2008-02-12T15:47:00" />
        <text id="2008021216ca1bfe3c4a4b40b0000403">
          <timeStamp time="2008-02-12T15:47:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (15:47):</by>  It was my understanding that police officers are authorised officers under the Environmental Protection Act. I believe a complaint was made, perhaps by a disgruntled former employee or some person who was aware of this. Their having made a complaint, I believe the owners of the Arkaroola operation made initial inquiries and then contacted the police, who are authorised officers under the EP Act. They made some initial discoveries and alerted PIRSA and the EPA, who then came and undertook the investigation about which I have just commented at length in my ministerial statement.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>