<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-11-21" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1441" />
  <endPage num="1530" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Mineral Exploration</name>
      <text id="200711214d27d88601c6400980000314">
        <heading>MINERAL EXPLORATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-21">
            <name>MINERAL EXPLORATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-21T14:38:00" />
        <text id="200711214d27d88601c6400980000315">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-21T14:38:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:38):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Submissions close on Friday 23 November (this coming Friday). In the foreword or introduction the minister states, as I said earlier in my question, 'subject to full consultation with all stakeholders'. Can the minister—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200711214d27d88601c6400980000316">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  There is no explanation in supplementary questions.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200711214d27d88601c6400980000317">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  Have all tenement holders in South Australia been provided with advice on this proposed set of amendments?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Urban Development and Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2007-11-21T14:39:00" />
        <text id="200711214d27d88601c6400980000318">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-21T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (14:39):</by>  The existence of this consultation paper was advertised. There was a very large advertisement in the press in the sections that cover all of the tenements. Whenever mining tenements are reissued, of course they need to be advertised in the press. There is a section in the press for those things, which those people concerned are regular readers of. So, I think anyone in that situation would have been well aware of this, either through that or through their industry bodies.</text>
        <text id="200711214d27d88601c6400980000319">As I said, I am not exactly sure whether every single person who has ever held a tenement in South Australia has been notified. However, I can assure honourable member that any serious player within the mining industry in this state would be well aware of the existence of the paper, either directly or through their bodies, and they will contact—</text>
        <text id="200711214d27d88601c6400980000320">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="52">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200711214d27d88601c6400980000321">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  Well, as a matter of fact, at least one small miner has written to me about it. So, they are well aware of it as well. I am sure they have received a copy directly or else they also look at that relevant section of the newspaper where tenements are set out.</text>
        <text id="200711214d27d88601c6400980000322">I totally reject the assertion that, somehow or other, there has not been adequate consultation on this proposal. As I have said, contrast that with cases we have had in the past, particularly under the previous government, where legislation such as this would have been dropped cold. The fact is that this is really a discussion paper. We will then move to legislation, and we will have even more discussion at that stage—and it will also be discussed here in parliament. So, it is just nonsense to suggest that there has not been adequate consultation with the industry on these matters.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>