<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-11-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1397" />
  <endPage num="1440" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Drug Detection Dogs</name>
      <page num="1406" />
      <text id="200711202fcf2d7b16194a9290000165">
        <heading>POLICE DRUG DETECTION DOGS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-20">
            <name>POLICE DRUG DETECTION DOGS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-20T15:01:00" />
        <text id="200711202fcf2d7b16194a9290000166">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-20T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:01):</by>  When the minister met with the dog operation squad, was he told by the police that they require changes in the legislation for these dogs to do all the tasks for which they have been trained?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-20">
            <name>POLICE DRUG DETECTION DOGS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-20T15:01:00" />
        <text id="200711202fcf2d7b16194a9290000167">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-20T15:01:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (15:01):</by>  When I first spoke to the Police Commissioner in relation to this matter, it was indicated by him that we needed to look into the legislation.</text>
        <text id="200711202fcf2d7b16194a9290000168">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200711202fcf2d7b16194a9290000169">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY:</by>  When I first spoke to him the answer was not yes. When I first spoke to him the answer was that they would need to investigate it and, in fact, the consideration of that matter took a long time. If the honourable member goes back and re-reads the answers to the questions, he will see that the police themselves were, in the early days, investigating whether in fact legislative change was needed and, if so, what form it would take. That is when I first spoke to the Commissioner.</text>
        <text id="200711202fcf2d7b16194a9290000170">Following that work by the police it was determined that yes—after they had examined the matter fully—it would be useful to have the legislation changed, and it will be. As I said, it is going on a list. There is a whole lot of other legislation that needs changing. Perhaps if we spent a little less time on the enormous amount of private members business in this place we might be able to make more progress with some of the massive amount of government legislation we have to deal with.</text>
        <text id="200711202fcf2d7b16194a9290000171">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200711202fcf2d7b16194a9290000172">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>