<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-11-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1341" />
  <endPage num="1397" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Judiciary, Appointments</name>
      <text id="20071115ccc19a072c5c43d7a0000462">
        <heading>JUDICIARY, APPOINTMENTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="603" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.D. LAWSON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-15">
            <name>JUDICIARY, APPOINTMENTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-15T14:53:00" />
        <text id="20071115ccc19a072c5c43d7a0000463">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-15T14:53:00" />
          <by role="member" id="603">The Hon. R.D. LAWSON (14:53):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Leader of the Government, representing the Attorney-General, a question about judicial appointments.</text>
        <text id="20071115ccc19a072c5c43d7a0000464">Leave granted. </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="603" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.D. LAWSON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071115ccc19a072c5c43d7a0000465">
          <by role="member" id="603">The Hon. R.D. LAWSON:</by>  Members will recall the famous occasion in July 2005 when the government failed to comply with the law in relation to the appointment of a judge. That error had to be corrected and a new appointment made, and the subsequent gazettal acknowledged that the initial appointment had not been effectual. The error was an embarrassment to the Attorney-General because he was responsible for it, and it was doubly embarrassing because he is the first law officer and is expected to know the law of this state. It was triply embarrassing to the Attorney-General, in particular, because the surprise appointee was none other than the sister of Don Farrell.</text>
        <text id="20071115ccc19a072c5c43d7a0000466">More recently, the Attorney-General's conduct in relation to the appointment of solicitor Ms Julie McIntyre to the District Court has given rise to widespread concern in the legal fraternity. I make it clear that I am not for a moment questioning the integrity or competence of Judge McIntyre, but my questions are:</text>
        <text id="20071115ccc19a072c5c43d7a0000467">1.&amp;#x9;Will the Attorney-General deny reports that he recommended the appointment of the highly qualified barrister Mark Griffin QC to the District Court to fill the vacancy that was subsequently filled by Judge McIntyre?</text>
        <page num="1371" />
        <text id="20071115ccc19a072c5c43d7a0000468">2.&amp;#x9;Will the Attorney-General deny reports that during the course of consultations about the appointment of a new District Court judge it was stated by him or his representative that the appointment had to be a woman?</text>
        <text id="20071115ccc19a072c5c43d7a0000469">3.&amp;#x9;Does the Attorney-General agree with the federal Labor Party's shadow attorney-general Joe Ludwig that there ought to be independent oversight of the process of appointing judges?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <startTime time="2007-11-15T14:54:00" />
        <text id="20071115ccc19a072c5c43d7a0000470">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-15T14:54:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (14:54):</by>  I think the third question is relevant to the Attorney-General; the other two are really just about gossip, and I think the Attorney-General has much better things to do in this state than respond to the gossip of members opposite. As I said, in relation to the broader policy question I will see whether the Attorney-General wishes to make a response. I will refer it to him.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>