<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-11-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1195" />
  <endPage num="1249" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Auditor-General's Report</name>
      <text id="20071113e5efa1738d8f4aac90000479">
        <heading>AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-13">
            <name>AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20071113e5efa1738d8f4aac90000480">In reply to <by role="member" id="605">the Hon. R.I. LUCAS</by> (15 November 2006).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-13">
            <name>AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20071113e5efa1738d8f4aac90000481">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning):</by>  Page 819 of the Auditor-General's report indicates a repayment of $200,000 in relation to long term borrowings. This balance sheet item relates to the Commissioner of Police Advance Account Numbers 1 and 2 (imprest accounts) and represents interest free funds advanced by the Department of Treasury and Finance (DTF).</text>
        <text id="20071113e5efa1738d8f4aac90000482">The introduction of the SA Government credit card along with agencies taking over control of their own accounts payable function saw the need for the use of imprest accounts diminish. In 2005-06 DTF wrote to SAPOL seeking repayment of the advance account. This appears as a cash out-flow from operating activities (supplies and services) and not a cash-flow from financing activities. This treatment is in accordance with accounting standards.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>