<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-11-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1195" />
  <endPage num="1249" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Glenthorne Farm</name>
      <text id="2007111333389f8728354c3090000309">
        <heading>GLENTHORNE FARM</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-13">
            <name>GLENTHORNE FARM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-13T14:43:00" />
        <text id="2007111333389f8728354c3090000310">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-13T14:43:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:43): </by> As a supplementary question, will the minister confirm whether the government has specifically instructed the University of Adelaide that no Glenthorne Farm site will be developed?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-11-13">
            <name>GLENTHORNE FARM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-11-13T14:44:00" />
        <text id="2007111333389f8728354c3090000311">
          <timeStamp time="2007-11-13T14:44:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (14:44):</by> As I said, the honourable member had her FOI. If you get this stuff, why don't you read the letter? I do not have it here. I have not looked at the file for a long time because nothing has happened in relation to it for at least 12 months. In terms of what the correspondence says specifically, as I said, the honourable member has that. What is the point of having the FOI laws if members do not read the information? It is quite clear—</text>
        <text id="2007111333389f8728354c3090000312">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="34">The Hon. J.M.A. Lensink interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2007111333389f8728354c3090000313">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> Mr President, I think the member is saying that the Labor candidate for Kingston would not be sleeping very well. So, the honourable member has dug up this FOI stuff that is 18 months old on a project that has been rejected by the government when there was a proposition about doing it, and she is now trying to suggest something. Let me repeat it. There was a proposition that the University of Adelaide put. It was unable to proceed with its original proposal. It would have been great if it could have grown the vineyards there but it could not do it. It wanted to look at some other option and the government did not support that option. Let me say that again: the government did not support that option 18 months or two years ago, and I am not aware of any subsequent proposal.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>