<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-10-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1139" />
  <endPage num="1196" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Cheltenham Park Racecourse</name>
      <text id="20071025f0f00037bb6e448780000309">
        <heading>CHELTENHAM PARK RACECOURSE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1819" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-25">
            <name>CHELTENHAM PARK RACECOURSE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-25T14:46:00" />
        <text id="20071025f0f00037bb6e448780000310">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-25T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1819">The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS (14:46):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Minister, will you provide us with the location of the transit-oriented developments in Perth upon which this development is modelled?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-25">
            <name>CHELTENHAM PARK RACECOURSE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-25T14:46:00" />
        <text id="20071025f0f00037bb6e448780000311">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-25T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (14:46):</by>  There are a number of good examples of such redevelopments. There are some around Subiaco. I think an authority has been established in Perth (the West Perth Redevelopment Authority, or something like that). Certainly, there is a body that has a special capacity for redeveloping those inner areas of Perth, particularly West Perth, around Subiaco, there are of a number of lines that radiate out from Perth, the Joondelup line being one of them. However, there is also the other line that goes up through the north of Perth through the centre. In Perth, I understand they are spending $2 billion on a new light railway down to Mandurah. However, here in this state, when we have a $30 million extension to the tramline, members opposite oppose it every inch of the way. I think that says a lot about members opposite: they think small and they act small.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>