<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-10-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1097" />
  <endPage num="1139" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Matters of Interest</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Federal Government Ministerial Accountability</name>
      <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000280">
        <heading>FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL ACCOUNTABILITY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2007-10-24T15:57:00" />
        <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000281">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-24T15:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (15:57):</by>  Today, I rise to talk about the lack of ministerial accountability in the federal government. When the federal Liberal government was elected in 1996, Prime Minister John Howard released his ministerial code of conduct, which outlines standards and practices that were to be maintained at all times. This code was introduced with the promise of ensuring an open and responsible government. The code of conduct stated that 'it is vital that ministers and parliamentary secretaries do not by their conduct undermine public confidence in them or the government'. For the Howard government, this was obviously a non-core promise. The Howard government has now been in power for 11½ years and what have we seen since then? We have seen John Howard's Ministerial Code of Conduct repeatedly tossed aside. First of all, we have seen repeated conflicts of interest, as follows:</text>
        <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000282">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">Richard Alston, during his time as communications minister was the beneficiary of a family trust holding Telstra shares.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000283">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">Former small business minister Geoff Prosser resigned after it was revealed he was still running three shopping centres.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000284">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">Former resources minister Warwick Parer, during the time of his ministry, held large interests in coal and other resource companies. I believe those interests were indeed large; they were around the $8 million mark.</item>
        </text>
        <page num="1118" />
        <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000285">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">Former industry minister John Moore, during the time of his ministry, held shares in numerous technology investment companies.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000286">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">A large government contract was given to parliamentary secretary Warren Entsch's concrete company.</item>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000287">On top of this, we have seen David Jull, John Sharp and Peter McGauran all made to resign after allegations of travel rorts and cover-ups. But that is just the start. The credibility of the federal government is disappearing faster than ice in the Arctic. We have had 11 years of aspirational goals, mostly honoured in the breach, instead of transparency and honesty. We have had 11 years of hypocrisy instead of accountability, and we have seen special privileges for family members.</text>
        <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000288">Wilson Tuckey lobbied a state police minister on behalf of his son over a minor traffic infringement, and Peter Reith lent his government phone card to his son, who then proceeded to rack up phone bills on the taxpayers' slate. Also, we have seen numerous disgraced former ministers move into high paying industry jobs in areas of their previous portfolio responsibilities. Immediately after he resigned as defence minister, Peter Reith was hired as a consultant to defence contractor Tenix, and health minister Michael Wooldridge signed a building contract for the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners worth $5 million just days before he resigned as health minister and was subsequently employed by—guess who?—the college as a consultant.</text>
        <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000289">However, it is not just former ministers who have become involved in this constant stream of code of conduct breaches. Many current senior cabinet ministers have also been involved in such scandals: Senator Coonan avoided land tax while she was minister for revenue and was later forced to resign from her position on the board of directors of the insurance dispute resolution company she ran from her own home. Employment services minister Mal Brough promoted work education programs that were later revealed to be fundraisers for the Liberal Party. Industry minister Ian Macfarlane was part of a detailed system of rorting that involved GST rebates from fundraisers that he was involved in which were organised by the Liberal Party. Treasurer Peter Costello proceeded to appoint Liberal Party donor, Robert Gerard, to the board of the Reserve Bank even after being informed by Mr Gerard that he was part of a 14-year Australian Taxation Office tax evasion dispute.</text>
        <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000290">We have also seen some outright shonks: Peter McGauran, while acting minister of communications, was unable to remember that he owned 70 poker machines. How can you forget you own 70 poker machines? The list got so bad that the Prime Minister, Mr Howard, dumped his code of conduct overboard rather than lose any other ministers. Finally, we come to the Prime Minister himself with a long list of misdemeanours, whose familiarity with the truth leaves much to be desired—and I may revisit this issue in a few weeks.</text>
        <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000291">The history I have outlined today can hardly be described as the record of an inclusive government, built on integrity and openness, or of a Prime Minister who can proclaim, 'I've got nothing to hide.' Prime Minister John Howard told ABC Radio in 1995:</text>
        <text id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000292">
          <inserted>Truth is absolute, truth is supreme, truth is never disposable in national political life.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="200710244df079a8c91c40feb0000293">For this Prime Minister, truth seems to have been the first casualty in his large collection of 'ministers overboard'.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>