<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-10-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1097" />
  <endPage num="1139" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Frequent Flyer Points</name>
      <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000146">
        <heading>FREQUENT FLYER POINTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-24">
            <name>FREQUENT FLYER POINTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-24T15:16:00" />
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000147">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-24T15:16:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:16):</by>  I have a supplementary question arising out of the answer.</text>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000148">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000149">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! I know why it is so hard for people to understand the minister's answers when everyone is talking. The minister was quite clear in his answer last time, and he just repeated that this time. </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000150">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS: </by> What is it that the Leader of the Government is hiding in refusing to provide this information, which all federal members of parliament somehow are able to provide?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <startTime time="2007-10-24T15:17:00" />
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000151">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-24T15:17:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (15:17):</by>  Well, I do not know whether federal parliamentarians have an arrangement with Qantas to provide on a separate account their particular information; I do not know whether or not that can be done. All I have said is that I have a lot better things to do than to go back over five years of monthly records—there would be 60 or 70 individual records—and divide—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. Lucas</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000152">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. Lucas: </by> When I was a minister I didn't have time for private travel.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000153">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> Well, there you are, Mr President; he was obviously too busy himself. The thing is that I do not think that when Rob Lucas was a minister the opposition would have sought to waste his time over such trivial questions. What is clear is that I comply with the guidelines. As I have said, I have well in excess of 400,000 points accumulated.</text>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000154">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000155">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> My last statement gives a cumulative total. Either the Hon. Rob Lucas believes me or he does not; it does not really worry me. It gives me no grief at all whether or not he chooses to believe me. As I indicated the other day, it would suit me fine if we did not get points for government travel, because I do not use them, anyway. Frankly, all they do is provide fodder for bored people like the Hon. Rob Lucas, who have nothing better to do with their time. Why isn't the Hon. Rob Lucas out helping his federal colleagues? Why isn't he out doing something to help his federal colleagues at the moment? I guess it is because they do not want his help. It shows how highly opposition members are regarded.</text>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000156">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000157">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000158">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> If the—</text>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000159">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000160">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> Well, no, they aren't actually. They are in their private time. </text>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000161">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000162">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> I am pleased the honourable member has raised that question, because he has said by way of interjection that my staff have been out helping Nicole Cornes. It is true that one of my staff members has a position on her campaign team. As I indicated to this parliament some time back in answer to a question, he assists that person in his private time, in his private capacity. It is a lot different from what happened at the last state election. I would like to refer members—</text>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000163">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000164">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000165">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> As the honourable member raised the issue and raised the accusation—</text>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000166">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="1109" />
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000167">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000168">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000169">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000170">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> What the question has a lot to do with is the sort of innuendo that—</text>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000171">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000172">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! There have been enough interjections. The honourable minister can answer the question in whichever way he sees fit.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="599">
        <name>The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000173">
          <by role="member" id="599">The Hon. J.S.L. DAWKINS: </by> On a point of order, Mr President. The minister is actually responding to an interjection which you would, quite rightly, tell him he is out of order in so doing.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000174">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Interjections are out of order but, unfortunately, I was not quick enough to rule that one out of order. Not being quick enough to rule it out of order, I will allow the minister to respond to it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000175">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> What is important is that the original question was making innuendos about me, and there was a further innuendo from the Leader of the Opposition in relation to the use of my staff. In the Adelaide <term>Advertiser </term>of Friday 5 May 2006, an article by Craig Bildstien (of course, a former Liberal member of parliament in Victoria), entitled 'Liberals "running on empty" in campaign', states:</text>
        <text id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000176">
          <inserted>The Liberal Party's finances were so bad before the March 18 election, MPs had to send almost 20 of their taxpayer-funded political staffers to the party's head office to run the campaign. In a damning appraisal of the election result, Liberal state director John Burston revealed the party barely raised enough money to 'keep the doors open' at its Greenhill Road offices. He admitted a considerable number of former opposition leader Rob Kerin's staff were seconded to work on the campaign at least seven weeks before the poll. 'At times, there were up to 18 extra staff,' he said in a report in the <term>Liberal Leader</term> newsletter out yesterday.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20071024773cb6ff85104c31b0000177">There were Liberal staffers (on the admission of the state executive) who were actually working there in the Liberal Party head office. Any staff who work for this government know the rules and abide by the rules, and any assistance they give is as individuals in their own time.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>