<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-10-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1097" />
  <endPage num="1139" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Frequent Flyer Points</name>
      <text id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000132">
        <heading>FREQUENT FLYER POINTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-24">
            <name>FREQUENT FLYER POINTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-24T15:13:00" />
        <text id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000133">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-24T15:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:13): </by> I seek leave to make an explanation before asking the  Leader of the Government a question about frequent flyer points.</text>
        <text id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000134">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000135">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS: </by> The leader will remember that on 17 October I asked him a question about frequent flyer points. It was a relatively simple question about how many frequent flyer points he personally had accumulated from any taxpayer-funded travel and whether or not he had used those frequent flyer points. I think that question had been on notice for some eight months or so. The minister's answer, in part—and I think he displayed an undue degree of sensitivity in relation to the question—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000136">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>Order! There will be no opinion.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000137">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS: </by> There will be none at all, Mr President, only facts. The minister said:</text>
        <text id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000138">
          <inserted>The problem with sorting those out is that it is not an easy exercise to determine their source.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000139">He went on to say:</text>
        <text id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000140">
          <inserted>As I said, when one gets a statement from Qantas, the points are accumulated and all grouped together whether it is private travel or personal—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000141">The <term>Hansard</term> report stops at that particular point. As a number of members will be aware and from their interjections at the time, when one looks at the frequent flyer point monthly summary (which was provided to members and the minister) that statement is not correct. The minister then went on to claim:</text>
        <text id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000142">
          <inserted>I know that I am very careful of what points I earn privately and I have only cashed in those frequent flyer points.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000143">The minister indicated that he had cashed in frequent flyer points but he had been very careful and he had only cashed in the frequent flyer points that he had accumulated from his personal credit charge usage. My question is: if the minister continues to claim that he cannot answer the question on notice because he cannot distinguish between points earned through his personal credit card and points earned through his taxpayer-funded travel, how on earth can he assure the parliament by saying, 'I know that I am very careful of what points I earn privately, and I have only cashed in those frequent flyer points.'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <startTime time="2007-10-24T15:15:00" />
        <text id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000144">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-24T15:15:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (15:15):</by>  The answer is that, when you get a credit card statement each month, it will give you the number of points accumulated on that credit card. So, if you go back and add up those points for each month, you know what they are. However, on the statement you get from Qantas, you get points from a number of sources. As I said when answering a question the other day, I make sure that my points are within my credit card limit. However, there is also private travel. </text>
        <page num="1108" />
        <text id="20071024a58aba8b40fd4b51b0000145">I would have to go back over statements for the past five or six years, and these are personal statements; they are not sent to the government office or anything but are sent to me personally. I would have to go back to every trip to, say, Melbourne or somewhere, and determine whether it was a private trip or a government trip. That is the easy explanation. Yes, you can keep tabs, although it is still a reasonably complicated exercise having to go back over a period of some time and, frankly, I have a lot better things to do than to go back and check those details. However, I like to ensure that, if I cash in any points, it is within the total of my private credit card. In relation to other sources, such as private travel that goes on to the total, you would have to go back to the source and distinguish whether or not it was government travel. That is the explanation.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>