<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-10-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1043" />
  <endPage num="1097" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>St Dimitrios Church</name>
      <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000121">
        <heading>ST DIMITRIOS CHURCH</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-23">
            <name>ST DIMITRIOS CHURCH</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-23T14:51:00" />
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000122">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-23T14:51:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (14:51): </by> As a supplementary question arising out of the answer, will the former acting treasurer in relation to this transaction confirm that he took no independent advice from any body, individual or organisation that knew anything about this grant before he threw $430,500 at them for this grant? </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-23">
            <name>ST DIMITRIOS CHURCH</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-23T14:52:00" />
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000123">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-23T14:52:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (14:52): </by> Again we hear about 'throwing money'. Let the Hon. Rob Lucas and his leader in another place come up and have the guts to talk about this organisation. In answer to the question, what I did was approve on advice of the Office of the Treasurer a transfer of money. It was not the role of the Treasurer to assess the application per se: it was—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. Lucas</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000124">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. Lucas: </by> It was your decision.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000125">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> The Hon. Rob Lucas believes that this group is not deserving. If he believes that I have acted in some way improperly, let him and his federal leader come up with—</text>
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000126">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000127">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> Come on; I'll stop.</text>
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000128">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000129">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> If you are going to talk about the Auditor-General, we know what the Hon. Rob Lucas did. I think you will find that he is the only treasurer in the history of this state who would come out and attack the then auditor-general of this state. The auditor-general was so critical of some of the things that he did, that he was attacked. I am happy to face the scrutiny of any investigation. My role was simply to approve a transfer of funds, which I did on the advice that I was provided. </text>
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000130">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="36">The Hon. R.I. Lucas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000131">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> I know the Hon. Rob Lucas does this all the time. He is a great one at making accusations. He spends his entire time when not sitting in parliament wallowing around in the political sewer. When he comes up, this is the only product. Just imagine: 25 years in parliament and this is the outcome; this is what you come to. The only questions you ever ask are questions making false accusations under parliamentary privilege. If the Hon. Rob Lucas believes the grant to the St Dimitrios cultural learning centre is undeserved, let he and the leader in the other place have the courage to stand up and say this grant should not have been made Let them say that this is not a deserving cause. They cannot, and they will not: they cannot do that. The Hon. Rob Lucas is interjecting so much now because he knows that, if it comes to the substance of this grant, there is nothing there—</text>
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000132">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="1051" />
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000133">
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY: </by> Sleazy accusations. Yes, he is a master of that; we know he is unparalleled in the South Australian parliament. He will set a reputation After 160 years of this Legislative Council, he has gained a reputation that will probably never be bettered in terms of the number of accusations he has made under parliamentary privilege. Let him come up with just one thing of substance that indicates that this particular grant is not justified. But he cannot.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1704">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000134">
          <by role="member" id="1704">The PRESIDENT:  </by>The Hon. Mr Wortley.</text>
        <text id="2007102370bf339bcbb04f8a80000135">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="55">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>