<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-10-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1043" />
  <endPage num="1097" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Arrest Warrants</name>
      <text id="200710235c256a257b84484aa0000092">
        <heading>POLICE ARREST WARRANTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-23">
            <name>POLICE ARREST WARRANTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-23T14:39:00" />
        <text id="200710235c256a257b84484aa0000093">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-23T14:39:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (14:39): </by>I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Police a question about outstanding arrest warrants.</text>
        <page num="1048" />
        <text id="200710235c256a257b84484aa0000094">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200710235c256a257b84484aa0000095">
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD: </by> Family First recently obtained data through the Freedom of Information Act from the Courts Administration Authority, which indicated that a staggering 30,498 court issued warrants are currently outstanding and active in South Australia, which is potentially one active warrant for every 50th South Australian on average. Family First has been advised by a SAPOL officer that the vast majority of active arrest warrants are not pursued. Most warrants are simply recorded and filed, due to a lack of resources. Police are generally waiting for an offender with a warrant to either hand themselves in or to be discovered by a routine traffic stop, or otherwise for the offender to be arrested on unrelated future charges. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="200710235c256a257b84484aa0000096">1.&amp;#x9;Is the minister concerned that there are so many potentially dangerous fugitives in the community or outstanding arrest warrants relating to them?</text>
        <text id="200710235c256a257b84484aa0000097">2.&amp;#x9;What percentage of the total number of outstanding arrest warrants is being actively pursued by SAPOL?</text>
        <text id="200710235c256a257b84484aa0000098">3.&amp;#x9;Of the percentage of those not being actively pursued, how do the police propose to apprehend those who do not drive and are therefore unlikely to be either pulled over by police on unrelated matters or impacted by a restriction of trade with Transport SA?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <startTime time="2007-10-23T14:41:00" />
        <text id="200710235c256a257b84484aa0000099">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-23T14:41:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (14:41): </by> I understand there are a number of reasons why arrest warrants may be outstanding. Obviously those warrants remain in force until they are exercised, and in some cases it could be many years. Some warrants may go back many years and the person may have gone overseas, died or whatever. More important is the number of those warrants that can be exercised. It is my understanding (and I will have to get information as I do not have the statistics with me) that what is important is the number of warrants we have now compared with what we had in the past, and whether this number, taken in absolute terms, is significant or otherwise. That depends on how many of these go back for many years. I will obtain that information for the honourable member and provide him with a response from the police as to their assessment of the significance of the particular number to which he refers.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>