<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-10-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1003" />
  <endPage num="1044" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Perpetual Lease Freeholding Program</name>
      <text id="200710183584f34818e7459a80000313">
        <heading>PERPETUAL LEASE FREEHOLDING PROGRAM</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="597" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-18">
            <name>PERPETUAL LEASE FREEHOLDING PROGRAM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-18T15:16:00" />
        <page num="1031" />
        <text id="200710183584f34818e7459a80000314">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-18T15:16:00" />
          <by role="member" id="597">The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER (15:16): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Environment and Conservation a question on perpetual lease freeholding programs.</text>
        <text id="200710183584f34818e7459a80000315">Leave granted</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="597" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="200710183584f34818e7459a80000316">
          <by role="member" id="597">The Hon. C.V. SCHAEFER:</by>  My colleague the member for Flinders has raised a number of issues with regard to the government compulsorily acquiring coastal and waterfront land as part of a process of freeholding perpetual lease land. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="200710183584f34818e7459a80000317">1.&amp;#x9;How many properties are affected by such compulsory acquisitions, if indeed they are talking place? </text>
        <text id="200710183584f34818e7459a80000318">2.&amp;#x9;How many properties are involved in the setting up of these—what are colloquially known as—conservation leases? </text>
        <text id="200710183584f34818e7459a80000319">3.&amp;#x9;How many agreements have been reached and completed? </text>
        <text id="200710183584f34818e7459a80000320">4.&amp;#x9;Has the Coastal Protection Branch compulsorily acquired any land as part of these agreements? </text>
        <text id="200710183584f34818e7459a80000321">5.&amp;#x9;Have buildings been included in coastal leases, or are they included in the freehold section of these agreements, as was the original understanding?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Environment and Conservation, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister Assisting the Minister for Health</electorate>
        <startTime time="2007-10-18T15:17:00" />
        <text id="200710183584f34818e7459a80000322">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-18T15:17:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Environment and Conservation, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister Assisting the Minister for Health) (15:17): </by> I thank the honourable member for her important questions. Indeed, the PLAF program has been very successful. It has been a very important program in acquiring coastal and waterfront stretches of land, with the aim of being able to protect those very important processes and better manage those important strips of land into the future.</text>
        <text id="200710183584f34818e7459a80000323">As members know, in response to individuals' concerns, the lease arrangements were amended to provide the condition of conservation leases, and that was welcomed by landholders. I understand that a number of people have taken up those options. My understanding is that the overall program has been extremely successful in acquiring these strips of land. I do not have the specific numbers with me, but I am more than happy to find out those exact numbers and bring them back to this chamber. I commend landholders and all of those who have successfully completed this program for their cooperation. As I said, the land management, planning and maintenance for that important coastal and waterfront land is in a much better position for the future.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>