<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-10-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1003" />
  <endPage num="1044" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Component Unloading Facility</name>
      <text id="200710188b78066cb6594e8b90000287">
        <heading>COMPONENT UNLOADING FACILITY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-18">
            <name>COMPONENT UNLOADING FACILITY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-18T15:05:00" />
        <text id="200710188b78066cb6594e8b90000288">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-18T15:05:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (15:05): </by> I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Mineral Resources Development a question about a proposed component unloading facility south of Port Augusta.</text>
        <text id="200710188b78066cb6594e8b90000289">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="1029" />
        <text id="200710188b78066cb6594e8b90000290">
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL: </by> I understand that BHP Billiton is close to finalising the location of a large component unloading facility and purpose-built haul corridor to service the expanded Olympic Dam mine. I understand that the company intends to ship in large pre-assembled modules (PAMs) into a specially constructed port facility and then transport these PAMs along a purpose-built road that is 55 metres wide. Pictures of these PAMs are quite extraordinary. They tower 60 metres high, are tens of metres wide and can weigh up to 2,000 tonnes each. Basically, it appears that the processing facilities for the Olympic Dam expansion will be designed in sections, assembled off site (presumably, in Asia, where the labour costs are cheaper, and perhaps giving lie to some of the job creation spin around this project), and then reassembled on site in Roxby Downs.</text>
        <text id="200710188b78066cb6594e8b90000291">The Greens have been contacted by some of the 284 shack owners on the western side of Spencer Gulf south of Port Augusta who are concerned that their properties will be compulsorily acquired to build this large industrial port. Naturally enough, they are concerned about the impact on their lifestyles, but they are also concerned about the impact on the fragile marine environment of the Upper Spencer Gulf, an area that has been flagged as a possible marine park. These coastal home owners want to have a say, and they are concerned about the lack of information provided to them so far about this development. Members should also note that a company cannot compulsorily acquire land, only a government can do so. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="200710188b78066cb6594e8b90000292">1. What sort of local approval processes are in place for this facility, or will this be wrapped up in the broader environmental impact statement for the Olympic Dam mine?</text>
        <text id="200710188b78066cb6594e8b90000293">2. Will any information about this facility be made publicly available before the release of the EIS?</text>
        <text id="200710188b78066cb6594e8b90000294">3. What contribution, financial or otherwise, will the government make to build this component unloading facility (or the haul road)?</text>
        <text id="200710188b78066cb6594e8b90000295">4. Does the government intend to compulsorily acquire any land from shack owners on the company's behalf?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <startTime time="2007-10-18T15:07:00" />
        <text id="200710188b78066cb6594e8b90000296">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-18T15:07:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (15:07): </by> The honourable member is jumping the gun. At present, a pre-feasibility study and an environmental impact statement are being undertaken by BHP. It is still drilling out, trying to find the extent of the resource. There are a number of unknowns. Parts of its proposed expansion are being looked at as we speak. There is a trial desal plant providing information to inform those studies. However, how BHP transports its equipment to the mine at Roxby Downs is an issue. It has obviously been looking at a number of alternatives. It has been in discussions with government agencies, and we have a special task force that is looking at that issue. At this stage, all that is still in the melting pot, as far as I am concerned. We do not expect the environmental impact statement to be completed until some time next year.</text>
        <text id="200710188b78066cb6594e8b90000297">Obviously, if there are any alterations or changes (such as what is being suggested by the honourable member), obviously, that would be part of any study. However, at this stage, I think it would be premature to suggest that any particular option has been selected by BHP. I think it is premature to expect that a determination will be made or that some studies will be undertaken until BHP has completed all that pre-feasibility work.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>