<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2007-10-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Second Session (51-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="845" />
  <endPage num="930" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Criminal Court Delays</name>
      <text id="2007101635e6b7489e59406ca0000229">
        <heading>CRIMINAL COURT DELAYS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="603" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.D. LAWSON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2007-10-16">
            <name>CRIMINAL COURT DELAYS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2007-10-16T15:25:00" />
        <text id="2007101635e6b7489e59406ca0000230">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-16T15:25:00" />
          <by role="member" id="603">The Hon. R.D. LAWSON (15:25):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Leader of the Government, representing the Attorney-General, a question about criminal court delays.</text>
        <text id="2007101635e6b7489e59406ca0000231">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="603" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.D. LAWSON</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2007101635e6b7489e59406ca0000232">
          <by role="member" id="603">The Hon. R.D. LAWSON: </by> In September 2005, charges were laid against Ms Wendy Utting, Mr Barry Standfield and Mr Craig Ratcliff as a result of events that occurred in early 2005. In August 2006, at the committal stage of these proceedings, Judge Marie Shaw tossed out most of the charges. However, the Director of Public Prosecutions laid ex officio indictments, and a few weeks ago Justice Nyland dismissed the application of the accused to have the charges permanently stayed. Earlier this month, a number of witnesses in the case were advised that the trial will not commence until 6 October 2008—that is, more than two years after the charges were laid and almost 2½ years after the events out of which these charges arose. This case highlights the endemic delays in our criminal courts, which have been noted by the Chief Justice and others in a number of reports. The Attorney-General has always assured this parliament that the matter of delays was in hand and that improvements were being implemented to reduce those delays. Justice delayed is justice denied, and this case clearly highlights the fact that the situation in the state has not improved. My questions to the Attorney-General and to the government are:</text>
        <text id="2007101635e6b7489e59406ca0000233">1.&amp;#x9;What action has the government actually taken to reduce the delays in our criminal courts?</text>
        <text id="2007101635e6b7489e59406ca0000234">2.&amp;#x9;Has there been assessment of the effectiveness of those measures?</text>
        <text id="2007101635e6b7489e59406ca0000235">3.&amp;#x9;What does the government propose to do to improve the situation?</text>
        <page num="859" />
        <text id="2007101635e6b7489e59406ca0000236">4.&amp;#x9;Given the fact that a number of government ministers and officials are said to be witnesses in this particular case, did the government make any representation, or were representations made on behalf of the government, to have the trial of this matter deferred until October 2008?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="574" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning</electorate>
        <startTime time="2007-10-16T15:28:00" />
        <text id="2007101635e6b7489e59406ca0000237">
          <timeStamp time="2007-10-16T15:28:00" />
          <by role="member" id="574">The Hon. P. HOLLOWAY (Minister for Police, Minister for Mineral Resources Development, Minister for Urban Development and Planning) (15:28):</by>  I am sure that the Hon. Robert Lawson is well aware that a review of the criminal justice delay issue was undertaken within government. I will refer the questions to the Attorney-General and bring back responses on how the findings have been implemented and what results are available to evaluate the findings of those reports.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>