<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2025-11-26T10:30:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="14323" />
  <endPage num="14414" />
  <dateModified time="2025-12-12T16:21:19+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true" uid="a7c7f09bb07d448cbe67b557283aaf1f">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject uid="ef6aca85f8d741bab93c2cbb3fccb1cf">
      <name>Property Taxes</name>
      <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000492">
        <heading>Property Taxes</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5387" referenceid="e05f224a87834b10abca5a0839ea45b3" uid="090e16f189d54e059a445c5f4093fb01" kind="question">
        <name>Mr BROWN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Florey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-11-26T00:00:00+10:30">
            <name>Property Taxes</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2025-11-26T14:46:34+10:30" />
        <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000493">
          <timeStamp time="2025-11-26T14:46:34+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5387" referenceid="e05f224a87834b10abca5a0839ea45b3" uid="090e16f189d54e059a445c5f4093fb01">Mr BROWN (Florey) (14:46):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. Can the Treasurer inform the house of any recent real estate industry comments regarding unintended consequences of changes to property taxes?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22" uid="256cb420a8d94db6b7373d784a2c1aa3" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Treasurer</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy and Mining</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-11-26T00:00:00+10:30">
            <name>Property Taxes</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2025-11-26T14:46:50+10:30" />
        <page num="14357" />
        <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000494">
          <timeStamp time="2025-11-26T14:46:50+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22" uid="256cb420a8d94db6b7373d784a2c1aa3">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Energy and Mining) (14:46):</by>  I thank the member for his question and his keen interest in property taxes. It was to my great surprise that I saw an article on a property website—I am a big fan of realestate.com; I am constantly on the lookout—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" uid="8382d0ac21cc4d74a9d81beedd226398" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. Tarzia</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000495">
          <by role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" uid="8382d0ac21cc4d74a9d81beedd226398">The Hon. V.A. Tarzia:</by>  Buying or selling?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22" uid="32037670235847de83bff869c8a371f5" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Treasurer</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy and Mining</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000496">
          <by role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22" uid="32037670235847de83bff869c8a371f5">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Who knows? I saw an article cited and it stated there were mixed reactions across the property sector to the state opposition's plan to cut nearly a third of the state's revenue in abolishing stamp duty. My young friend is confused: we do not apply the GST. The GST is a commonwealth tax that is given to the states. I am talking about the state's own tax revenues that we have and that is a third of it by cutting stamp duty.</text>
        <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000497">We have been told by our friends opposite that they have a plan to phase this out by 2041, but they have yet to explain how this measure will be funded and it hasn't gone unnoticed by the real estate sector, which is concerned. Those opposite are quite happy about it. The Real Estate Institute of South Australia's Chief Executive Officer, Andrea Heading, encouraged the opposition to define how and where they would fill the shortfall. She goes on to say:</text>
        <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000498">
          <inserted>REISA supports a re-balanced, forward-looking taxation model that treats the property sector fairly...</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000499">So that's one tick for the Leader of the Opposition because he is thinking about getting rid of this tax, like they did in the ACT when they abolished stamp duty and replaced it with a broad-based land tax on the family home. In New South Wales, where Liberal Premier Dominic Perrottet wanted to abolish stamp duty on residential properties, he also was going to replace it with a broad-based property tax on people's homes. So this is what REISA is awaiting. She goes on to say:</text>
        <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000500">
          <inserted>…while ensuring the state has the revenue needed to deliver on South Australia's priorities.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000501">So they have raised the alarm. Hang on a second, there is one part of this puzzle that is missing. We get that you want to abolish stamp duty, but where is the tax to replace it? Where's the tax on the family home? Where's the tax on the family home, Mr Speaker?</text>
        <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000502">The Real Estate Buyers Agents Association of Australia is also concerned. Matt O'Donoghue is at pains to point out that the financial shortfall will be hard to replace, but more concerning are his comments about the impact on prices of family homes. He says:</text>
        <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000503">
          <inserted>To abolish stamp duty will create more impetus for buyers to jump into the market, which will no doubt put pressure on current pricing on units, apartments and housing.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000504">He goes on to say:</text>
        <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000505">
          <inserted>If demand increases in an already high-demand market, it could potentially push prices even higher, which would basically counteract the move to abolish stamp duty.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000506">These are the people who sell houses for a living. These are people whose business it is to sell houses. Those opposite need to think about this more carefully. Everywhere we have seen this tax abolished, a broad-based land tax has been brought in on family homes that have no land tax. That is a conversation that is coming to the South Australian community courtesy of members opposite. New South Wales and ACT, everywhere this tax has been proposed to be abolished, they have replaced it with a broad-based land tax. If you are talking about commercial properties, they already have a land tax.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202511269ef7d7e4424140d0a0000507">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Before I call the member for Frome, the Leader and deputy leader are becoming increasingly rowdy, and I just give you your first warnings.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>