<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2025-09-17T10:30:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="13315" />
  <endPage num="13390" />
  <dateModified time="2025-09-18T15:25:33+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true" uid="3f5dd22fa4c447ff9b07a9e1ef68c4c3">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject uid="e271e93548e24c0eadc39a3fbe9d91d9">
      <name>Business Compliance</name>
      <text id="202509175e79316688584996b0000986">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Business Compliance</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" uid="418cc074ac9c4c56857973fdda6d14e4" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mr BATTY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-09-17T01:00:00+09:30">
            <name>Business Compliance</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2025-09-18T00:00:00+09:30" />
        <text id="202509175e79316688584996b0000987">
          <inserted>
            <timeStamp time="2025-09-18T00:00:00+09:30" />In reply to <by role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" uid="418cc074ac9c4c56857973fdda6d14e4">Mr BATTY (Bragg)  </by>(23 June 2025).  (Estimates Committee B)</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5572" referenceid="8d5fbcb4f22e401a94a6418aed69abc2" uid="e092c47d4635447b88b4f28df73d23c0" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. MICHAELS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small and Family Business</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-09-17T01:00:00+09:30">
            <name>Business Compliance</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="202509175e79316688584996b0000988">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="5572" referenceid="8d5fbcb4f22e401a94a6418aed69abc2" uid="e092c47d4635447b88b4f28df73d23c0">The Hon. A. MICHAELS (Enfield—Minister for Small and Family Business, Minister for Consumer and Business Affairs, Minister for Arts):</by>  I have been advised of the following:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="202509175e79316688584996b0000989">
          <inserted>Consumer and Business Services (CBS) notes that a number of these inspections have taken place at repeat locations, and that this figure does not represent 500 individual premises. Of the inspections conducted, noncompliance was detected on 74 occasions.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>