<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2025-09-16T11:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="13075" />
  <endPage num="13313" />
  <dateModified time="2025-09-17T16:12:49+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true" uid="15a42651d83d45c888e5397e05173b85">
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <subject uid="6c216902c5a7416e90b6eed86d7426ad">
      <name>Local Government</name>
      <text id="20250916f1bf3590a4794e4ca0000491">
        <heading>Local Government</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3123" referenceid="bac290ac22d24c1a802769464ce7f85d" uid="6ab134f779ba48a3a00e63e3b4157f6f" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. A. PICCOLO</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Light</electorate>
        <startTime time="2025-09-16T15:26:25+09:30" />
        <text id="20250916f1bf3590a4794e4ca0000492">
          <timeStamp time="2025-09-16T15:26:25+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="3123" referenceid="bac290ac22d24c1a802769464ce7f85d" uid="6ab134f779ba48a3a00e63e3b4157f6f">The Hon. A. PICCOLO (Light) (15:26):</by>  It is often said that local government is the sphere of government that is the closest to the people. There is a significant element of truth to that statement. While citizens interact with all spheres of government, they probably have the most contact with their local council, so it is no accident that, of all the complaints I receive in my office about government, 50 per cent would be about some local government decision or action.</text>
        <page num="13113" />
        <text id="20250916f1bf3590a4794e4ca0000493">It is important that we have local governments that are both efficient and effective: efficient in delivering the services required by their communities and effective in providing meaningful representation to the people who live in their areas. Additionally, they need to be financially sustainable and environmentally responsible. This is not an easy challenge to meet. That is why our councils need to be of a size and have boundaries that meet those two goals. Having the right council boundaries is a vexed issue. Any boundary changes should help build financial sustainability and deliver cultural change that leads to better outcomes for ratepayers and residents.</text>
        <text id="20250916f1bf3590a4794e4ca0000494">Some years ago, the Gawler council decided to lodge an application to alter its boundaries to include Concordia, Hewett, Gawler Belt, Ward Belt and Buchfelde in the Town of Gawler. This particular process involved the Light Regional and Barossa councils and, to a lesser extent, the City of Playford. It has been a very torturous, lengthy and expensive process, which has created some acrimony amongst the affected councils. Considering all the direct and indirect costs, the process has probably cost the participating councils over $500,000 collectively in a time of increasing cost pressures.</text>
        <text id="20250916f1bf3590a4794e4ca0000495">Recently, the Local Government Boundaries Commission issued its report outlining a range of recommendations. The report also included recommendations made by BDO consultants, who undertook the bulk of the investigations, including engagement with the community and the three affected councils. The changes proposed with the City of Playford are minor boundary changes and have generated no controversy. While the changes proposed with the City of Playford have raised no controversy, the other major proposed changes are not supported by either the ratepayers and residents in the area or the councils.</text>
        <text id="20250916f1bf3590a4794e4ca0000496">It should be noted there are some inconsistencies between the BDO recommendations and the commission's final recommendations. BDO does not support the Barossa and Light Regional council changes. Light Regional and the Town of Gawler are both in my electorate. It is now up to the minister to either accept or reject the recommendations or send them back to the commission for further work or a combination thereof.</text>
        <text id="20250916f1bf3590a4794e4ca0000497">While I am on record supporting reform in the local government sector, I do not support this proposal and would strongly recommend to the minister that he rejects the proposals to incorporate Concordia, Hewett, Ward Belt, Gawler Belt and Buchfelde into the Town of Gawler. A good reform process or proposal should leave the ratepayers and all the participating councils better off after the changes. This proposal does not do that. It potentially makes one council financially better off and financially weakens the other two. This is not a good outcome.</text>
        <text id="20250916f1bf3590a4794e4ca0000498">Secondly, the Concordia proposal would undermine the state Housing Roadmap by delaying the delivery of land onto the market. This is in a time of housing crisis when we cannot afford to derail the proposed Concordia development. In short, this is the wrong proposal at the wrong time. However, reform is needed, and that is why over the past few years I have been working with the Town of Gawler, Light Regional Council, Adelaide Plains Council and The Barossa Council to explore how the councils could become more effective and efficient by working more closely together.</text>
        <text id="20250916f1bf3590a4794e4ca0000499">This process has been turbocharged by the recent publication of the Greater Adelaide Regional Plan. Two councils, Gawler and Light Regional Council, have already agreed to collaborate to see how they can best respond to the challenges of growth. Barossa and the Adelaide Plains councils will consider their involvement this month. This process will hopefully encourage councils to explore where opportunities exist to work more closely and share resources to deliver better outcomes for ratepayers and residents. I would encourage the minister to send this report back to the commission and ask them to present recommendations that deliver broader and real reforms.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>