<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2025-09-03T10:30:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="12929" />
  <endPage num="13008" />
  <dateModified time="2025-09-04T15:29:01+09:30" />
  <proceeding uid="d9c4681dfb9a4d718883f182b98a7379">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000293">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject uid="530cea6f4e574c3286e4ed640e8bca08">
      <name>North Adelaide Public Golf Course</name>
      <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000294">
        <heading>North Adelaide Public Golf Course</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" uid="24fd8096682f462ea964f029e9d825fa" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. TARZIA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-09-03T01:00:00+09:30">
            <name>North Adelaide Public Golf Course</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2025-09-03T14:15:17+09:30" />
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000295">
          <timeStamp time="2025-09-03T14:15:17+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" uid="24fd8096682f462ea964f029e9d825fa">The Hon. V.A. TARZIA (Hartley—Leader of the Opposition) (14:15):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Will the Premier cap at $50 million the state government's financial commitment to the North Adelaide Golf Course redevelopment project and, if not, why not? With your leave, sir, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000296">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" uid="51faac60a82f4f399eccb8a82e662bb9" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. TARZIA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000297">
          <by role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" uid="51faac60a82f4f399eccb8a82e662bb9">The Hon. V.A. TARZIA:</by>  In 2011, the then parliament put a $535 million cap on the government's financial commitment to the redevelopment of Adelaide Oval.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="900325458acb433a9f861a7aa16f9152" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2025-09-03T14:15:37+09:30" />
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000298">
          <timeStamp time="2025-09-03T14:15:37+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="900325458acb433a9f861a7aa16f9152">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Premier) (14:15):</by>  The government has a budget for the project. The project is operating in accordance with that budget. We see it being an important economic opportunity for the state but also a very significant investment in public amenity for people who are using the Parklands. That's what makes this such a unique proposition, is that we have got an investment in public amenity in the Parklands for a publicly-owned asset the South Australian public will be able to use. It's a very different proposition from the $600-plus million—in fact, what would have almost certainly ended up being a billion-dollar basketball stadium the public wouldn't be able to play on. This is a golf course that the public will be able to play on. It is shaping up to be a—</text>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000299">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000300">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley is on his final warning.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="9d83b1d80c5e41d0aee4fc16a90f29c3" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000301">
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="9d83b1d80c5e41d0aee4fc16a90f29c3">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS:</by>  It is shaping up to be yet another example of how the Liberal Party are very at ease associating themselves with opposition to Adelaide Oval, opposition to the Adelaide 500—</text>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000302">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000303">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Premier, if you can be seated. Member for Morialta, member for Hammond, you will listen to the Premier in silence after we hear this point of order from the deputy leader.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="8149354c9e0142fb85b896b3936a516a">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000304">
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="8149354c9e0142fb85b896b3936a516a">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  It's standing order 98(a). I'm conscious that it's only so far in. The question is very directly associated with the cap on the cost for this project. The Premier is embarking on wideranging debate, including reflecting on irrelevant matters associated with this site.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000305">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Thank you, deputy leader. I have been paying attention to the answer. The Premier did start off saying that there was a budget and he has, I think, gone into the territory of comparing and contrasting with some other capital works that have been proposed or carried out. I will keep listening, but I am sure the Premier will not stray too far from the subject matter.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="7148789de0a44c29bdcfa38c25c3d9fa" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000306">
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="7148789de0a44c29bdcfa38c25c3d9fa">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS:</by>  As I was saying, this is a project that is shaping up to be in the same category as other critical milestone projects for our state. The Libs opposed Adelaide Oval—we got it done. They shut down the Adelaide 500—we brought it back. They were opposed to Majors Road—we are delivering it; in fact, they were a bit all over the place on that one. The Adelaide Aquatic Centre, they made noise and sought to oppose that—we're delivering it, and for the golf course it is the same equation. They are going to fall into the trap of racing down the path to any sort of voice of dissent, any minority view that they think—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="ce47de1fea0e4878aa7aa5174d6a9ccb">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000307">
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="ce47de1fea0e4878aa7aa5174d6a9ccb">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  Point of order. He has continued to prove up the point that I raised a minute or so ago. There's no attempt to deal with anything remotely associated with a cap on the $50 million budget.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000308">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I will keep listening, but I think the Premier has not strayed too far from what the question was. It is an important question about the budget for something and the Premier is comparing it to other proposals that either got underway or did not. The Premier can continue.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="340fbed3a73f476698c962b1bf8bb231" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <page num="12957" />
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000309">
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="340fbed3a73f476698c962b1bf8bb231">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS:</by>  Whatever the minority view is they are racing towards, we are focusing on developing quality public amenity for the people of South Australia, which at the same time will deliver a major economic dividend. Here we are, having a golf course in the city that has been underinvested in forever, the council has had aspirations to invest in it and redevelop it but haven't had the capacity to be able to deal with their balance sheet. We do, and we are going to make it happen. Meanwhile, the Leader of the Opposition is hitching his wagon to Frank Pangallo and a myth that there are 5,400 trees going to be chopped down.</text>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000310">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36">The Hon. V.A. Tarzia interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="a91f188a010749fdbcc7497183548e02" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000311">
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="a91f188a010749fdbcc7497183548e02">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS:</by>  You stand next to Frank, and your 5,400-tree prediction, and let's see how that ends up for you. Let's see how that ends up for the Leader of the Opposition. Fast forward a few years and, all being well, we will cut that ribbon on the golf course. It will be just like when we cut the ribbon on the Adelaide Aquatic Centre and just like we cut the ribbon on Adelaide Oval. The opposition will start to reclaim a different version of history.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="f33816a4c4b741ef8412c2f579de6618">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000312">
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="f33816a4c4b741ef8412c2f579de6618">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  Point of order, sir. The Premier is now flagrantly disregarding your observation to give the Premier an opportunity to answer the substance of the question, and it's just further departing from anything remotely associated with the cap.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000313">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I understand you are frustrated, but it is much harder as these books in here allow. You have two former Speakers here. It is always much harder for those asking the questions and the limitations put on you. There is more licence given to those who are to answer the questions. I think the Premier is okay, but I will keep listening. The Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="0ff82183d9544ac699d514542b4c2a5e" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000314">
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" uid="0ff82183d9544ac699d514542b4c2a5e">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS:</by>  We have got a plan and a project for something that has been a resounding success for the state. We know that in the few short years that the LIV Golf tournament has been here, it has become the envy of other states around the country. It has been attended in numbers that no-one would have thought was predictable. The economic dividend has been real, the number of people who are getting employed in our state on the back of the huge numbers of visits that we have seen from these major events is something to be celebrated.</text>
        <text id="20250903aad716655e26471180000315">The Leader of the Opposition can't work out if he's for or against the LIV Golf. He got asked during the break. He says he is for it, and then he goes running around starting to argue against it. So Flip-Flop over there has got a different position every day of the week on this issue. We are going to remain focused and seek to get it done.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>