<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2025-06-04T10:30:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="12207" />
  <endPage num="12311" />
  <dateModified time="2025-06-06T14:35:12+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true" uid="5393b0561a2e4e44a0b428b00ff210c8">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject uid="d8bfafa3944e424b90e8fa749f9ec22e">
      <name>Police Motorcycles</name>
      <text id="20250604828ce03a905043de80000392">
        <heading>Police Motorcycles</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" uid="f1ec1a4581724aa6bcaa58d248104e75" kind="question">
        <name>Mr BATTY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-06-04T01:00:00+09:30">
            <name>Police Motorcycles</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2025-06-04T14:36:32+09:30" />
        <text id="20250604828ce03a905043de80000393">
          <timeStamp time="2025-06-04T14:36:32+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" uid="f1ec1a4581724aa6bcaa58d248104e75">Mr BATTY (Bragg) (14:36):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Police. Will the new police motorcycles be fitted with dash cams? With leave, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="20250604828ce03a905043de80000394">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" uid="fc035f2e35184e11a84c57ee21d9fabd" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr BATTY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <text id="20250604828ce03a905043de80000395">
          <by role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" uid="fc035f2e35184e11a84c57ee21d9fabd">Mr BATTY:</by>  It was reported last year that frontline officers were resorting to buying their own dash cams for use in police vehicles for their own safety.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="3853e35dd95d4eda97057af90fc5eb42" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Treasurer</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence and Space Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2025-06-04T14:36:53+09:30" />
        <text id="20250604828ce03a905043de80000396">
          <timeStamp time="2025-06-04T14:36:53+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="3853e35dd95d4eda97057af90fc5eb42">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Treasurer, Minister for Defence and Space Industries, Minister for Police) (14:36):</by>  This was discussed extensively last year when the. member for Bragg tried to promulgate this as an issue publicly. Frontline police do have cameras, body-worn cameras. That has been the most effective way of providing police with additional visual surveillance capability across their various policing tasks and, as we have discussed and as it has been advised to me by South Australia Police, some frontline service staff, including South Australian police, choose to have this. Some choose not to, given the vast array of other equipment that is provided, and that will remain the choice for people. We make sure that police have the operational equipment they need, as advised to us from South Australian Police.</text>
        <text id="20250604828ce03a905043de80000397">God forbid we get into a situation where those opposite occupy the Treasury benches and they start trying to exercise the discretion which, in the Police Act, is only afforded to the police commissioner to make operational judgements. I know the member for Bragg is new to this place, I know he's new to the role, I know he's new to representative responsibility and is finding his way understanding the responsibilities of executive government, but we have legislation which determines who is responsible for doing what in the community. It might pay him to just read the first 10 clauses of the Police Act and it will be clear.</text>
        <text id="20250604828ce03a905043de80000398">It will not be up to the neophyte member for Bragg to be telling the police commissioner how things should be done. He cannot seem to prosecute that within the South Australian Liberal Party; I would not expect him to have any success prosecuting it within South Australia Police.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="b34e8cf8106b4683acc2f4ef125ed7dc">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250604828ce03a905043de80000399">
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="b34e8cf8106b4683acc2f4ef125ed7dc">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  Point of order; standing order 127(3). The Treasurer might have sat down, but it is clearly an extended reflection on a member. It's impermissible.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250604828ce03a905043de80000400">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  If the member feels he has a grievance to bring up on a personal reflection, he can make that point himself.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>