<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2025-03-06T11:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="11233" />
  <endPage num="11301" />
  <dateModified time="2025-05-15T15:35:48+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject uid="42bc8e51c392445c877e5977471a42ed">
      <name>Youth and Street Gangs Task Force</name>
      <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000421">
        <heading>Youth and Street Gangs Task Force</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" uid="70c7dd20f30348bc9022f8811bfce745" kind="question">
        <name>Mr BATTY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-03-06T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Youth and Street Gangs Task Force</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2025-03-06T14:42:55+10:30" />
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000422">
          <timeStamp time="2025-03-06T14:42:55+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" uid="70c7dd20f30348bc9022f8811bfce745">Mr BATTY (Bragg) (14:42):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Police. Did the minister approve a press release that stated an extra 13 police officers would be joining the Youth and Street Gangs Task Force and, if so, why? With your leave, sir, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000423">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" uid="a43681734f784c09887c137888b6cee3" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr BATTY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000424">
          <by role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" uid="a43681734f784c09887c137888b6cee3">Mr BATTY:</by>  When asked about this press release at the Budget and Finance Committee on 24 February, the Commissioner of Police said, 'I saw that myself and it is not an additional 13 staff.' He went on to say, 'It may have been a misunderstanding, but it's certainly not the case it was extra. We have never tried to project it in a way that it was extra.'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="c0d3ed60757c42308aee8d8c94b53868" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Treasurer</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence and Space Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2025-03-06T14:43:38+10:30" />
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000425">
          <timeStamp time="2025-03-06T14:43:38+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="c0d3ed60757c42308aee8d8c94b53868">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Treasurer, Minister for Defence and Space Industries, Minister for Police) (14:43):</by>  As I explained in my previous answer—and it was difficult, of course, for the member for Bragg, because he spent four minutes yelling at me rather than listening. I know it's early on for him in all walks of his life, but it might actually be good for him to learn the value of listening. When he asks a question, sits down and bellows for four minutes, it does of course put a substantial element of truth into the saying that the empty vessels, in that case, do make the loudest noise. The empty vessels do seem to make the loudest noise. The vacuous interjections from the member for Bragg—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="9afc0e814899479fb28d96493063478b">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000426">
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="9afc0e814899479fb28d96493063478b">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  Point of order: it is standing order 98. The minister would do well to respond to the question. That's what the standing orders require. The minister should direct his answer to the question.</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000427">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000428">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Leader of Government Business will come to order. Sorry, I didn't hear that point of order, deputy leader. There was a fair bit of noise on my right. I remind everyone on my right to keep the volume down.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="3ef6dc5f50af467e9e096a36ddb542c1">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000429">
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="3ef6dc5f50af467e9e096a36ddb542c1">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  Standing order 98: the minister needs to direct his answer to the question. He is clearly not doing that and he ought to be directed to do so.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="11267" />
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000430">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I think the minister is answering the question. The police minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="d0ffddfdc9394205bd1f0a83f7285679" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Treasurer</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence and Space Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000431">
          <by role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="d0ffddfdc9394205bd1f0a83f7285679">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker. As I explained in my previous answer—I am happy to reiterate it, because—</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000432">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa">Mr Batty interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="cc4b100d6d054769b59960d461727e1c" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Treasurer</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence and Space Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000433">
          <by role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="cc4b100d6d054769b59960d461727e1c">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  He is still interjecting, Mr Speaker. He can't help himself. It's compulsive. He literally cannot help himself. But do you know what? If he can listen, if he can bear to be without the sound of his own voice after he has asked a question, I will explain it again for him, because it still doesn't seem to be seeping in for the benefit of the member for Bragg.</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000434">Seventy additional officers have been made available because of the investments that this government has made. The police commissioner brought together Operation Mandrake and Operation Meld, which has meant that the previous practice of taking resourcing from other frontline duties could then cease, releasing a further 13 sworn officers onto frontline duties. That's worth celebrating. It's not something to criticise. It's not something to call a smokescreen. It's no reason to be criticising the move of the police commissioner, all of which the member for Bragg had done in the hours after the commissioner made that announcement.</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000435">The member for Bragg holds himself out as the single best person in this state to administer the police portfolio, and he has got off to a dreadful start, criticising the allocation of additional funding to our police, criticising the decisions of the police commissioner to allocate more sworn officers onto frontline duties, and so badly, badly bumbling his attempts at legislative reform, calling for legislative changes which were immediately ruled out by the police commissioner as being unworkable.</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000436">In any other operation, three strikes would be enough, but such is the dearth of talent over there—and of numbers, of course—that everybody gets a gig, regardless of capability and talent. It is extraordinary—it is extraordinary. Do the work, listen, rather than making vacuous noises all the time, and you might actually have something that you could concoct together as a legitimate policy to take to the people of South Australia and restore some credibility for yourself.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>