<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2025-03-06T11:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="11233" />
  <endPage num="11301" />
  <dateModified time="2025-05-15T15:35:36+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject uid="d652351d6ab745e3a0a2fea9ee646ae1">
      <name>Youth Offender Bail Laws</name>
      <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000340">
        <heading>Youth Offender Bail Laws</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" uid="b17d693ac0774bc480e6c2e9c1cfd488" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. TARZIA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2025-03-06T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Youth Offender Bail Laws</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2025-03-06T14:17:39+10:30" />
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000341">
          <timeStamp time="2025-03-06T14:17:39+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" uid="b17d693ac0774bc480e6c2e9c1cfd488">The Hon. V.A. TARZIA (Hartley—Leader of the Opposition) (14:17):</by>  My question is again to the Premier. When will the government complete its review of South Australian bail laws? With your leave, sir, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000342">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" uid="e942f94ea17149fc90a696c67139e073" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. TARZIA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000343">
          <by role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" uid="e942f94ea17149fc90a696c67139e073">The Hon. V.A. TARZIA:</by>  It was reported today that the South Australian Law Reform Institute would undertake a bail law review, something that the opposition has been calling for for around the last two years.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="237bf95d30f0485ea34961ccc8354f54" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Treasurer</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence and Space Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2025-03-06T14:18:01+10:30" />
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000344">
          <timeStamp time="2025-03-06T14:18:01+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="237bf95d30f0485ea34961ccc8354f54">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Treasurer, Minister for Defence and Space Industries, Minister for Police) (14:18):</by>  It's interesting, isn't it, that the Leader of the Opposition says they have been thinking about doing something for two years and we still don't have a proposition? Of course, we are all aware that there has been an intersection—</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000345">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="11261" />
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000346">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Flinders will leave the chamber for the rest of question time.</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000347">
          <event>The honourable member for Flinders having withdrawn from the chamber:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="c76f5211c39e4d459d10b84dfadc106a" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Treasurer</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence and Space Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000348">
          <by role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" uid="c76f5211c39e4d459d10b84dfadc106a">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  —between criminal justice agencies and the opposition leadership, hasn't there, which might have interrupted their policy formulation in recent times. Maybe that explains the delay.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000349">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Minister, the deputy leader has a point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="8411b315ff864cc282ac5c24068f0a5c">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000350">
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" uid="8411b315ff864cc282ac5c24068f0a5c">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  There is a point of order under standing order 98: the minister is debating the point when he needs to answer the question, and he has moved directly onto what sounds like a form of distraction from what is a clear question that needs to be answered.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000351">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I listened to the question from the leader, and leave was sought and leave was granted where the leader talked about the opposition. In listening to the minister's response, he is responding to and answering the question but also responding to those matters that were introduced after leave was sought. So we will return to the minister, who can continue his answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Treasurer</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence and Space Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000352">
          <by role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker. As I understood the question, and in particular the explanation from the Leader of the Opposition, he was explaining that over the last two years the opposition has had opportunities to become familiar with criminal justice agencies.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000353">
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  Point of order: the minister has flagged the subject matter of this distraction. It's a point of order under standing order 98. The minister is now defying your ruling, Speaker. I ask you direct him back to the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000354">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Deputy Leader, this is a bogus point of order. He is not defying anything, he is answering the question and he is responding to the explanation that was given when leave was granted by the chamber to do it. The Minister for Police.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" referenceid="f23532a2ce2a49c8b700d8422552289d" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. D.G. Pisoni</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000355">
          <by role="member" id="3124" referenceid="f23532a2ce2a49c8b700d8422552289d">The Hon. D.G. Pisoni:</by>  What is Bernie Finnigan doing these days, anyway?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000356">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley will leave the chamber for the rest of question time.</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000357">
          <term>The honourable member for Unley having withdrawn from the chamber:</term>
        </text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000358">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000359">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Florey will come to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Treasurer</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence and Space Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000360">
          <by role="member" id="4842" referenceid="78a22826e43d4639bdfa63b5f3ef73f9">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  The Attorney has made it clear, indeed on radio this morning, that he expects advice to him on the appropriate specific changes to the bail laws in the coming weeks. On top of that, in the broader reforms that were announced today, there will be immediate action that will continue under this government as we have already taken action over the last three years in a series of legislative changes. In fact, I think there have been nearly 30 legislative changes sponsored by the Attorney-General, as well as other ministers, to strengthen our legislative regime to better protect the public at the same time that we have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in our police and in our criminal justice agencies.</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000361">That is the record of a government that is investing heavily and toughening laws to better protect our community. That is the record of this government. If those opposite think that they have a better story to tell when it comes to criminal justice, when it comes to protecting the community, they should articulate it because they don't have that record, they don't have a record of coming up with specific reforms and prosecuting them as a political party.</text>
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000362">The countdown is now on. We are 12 months out from the next state election. We have had three years of silence from those opposite, amidst the turmoil and the comings and goings and leavings and all of the other distractions that those opposite have had, including their direct interactions with criminal justice agencies, but we have been getting on with the job, toughening our laws, investing in our police, investing in our criminal justice agencies to better protect the community.</text>
        <page num="11262" />
        <text id="20250306cf2807559a57491e90000363">We had not been left with a very good record from those opposite after their term in government, but we are trying to make sure that not only can we invest more heavily in our criminal justice agency and toughen our laws, but we can give confidence to the community that we are making the changes and the investments necessary to keep them safe.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>