<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2024-10-30T10:30:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9943" />
  <endPage num="10058" />
  <dateModified time="2024-11-07T15:58:18+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Quarry Sites</name>
      <text id="20241030a373e0a7d47c49c3b0000485">
        <heading>Quarry Sites</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5383" referenceid="8d20958c10414e3591302354e69fab31" kind="question">
        <name>Mr McBRIDE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-10-30T00:00:00+10:30">
            <name>Quarry Sites</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-10-30T14:48:05+10:30" />
        <text id="20241030a373e0a7d47c49c3b0000486">
          <timeStamp time="2024-10-30T14:48:05+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5383" referenceid="8d20958c10414e3591302354e69fab31">Mr McBRIDE (MacKillop) (14:48):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport. Can the minister inform the house about the importance of using the highest quality road-making material on our network? Mr Speaker, with your leave and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="20241030a373e0a7d47c49c3b0000487">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5383" referenceid="8d20958c10414e3591302354e69fab31" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr McBRIDE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <text id="20241030a373e0a7d47c49c3b0000488">
          <by role="member" id="5383" referenceid="8d20958c10414e3591302354e69fab31">Mr McBRIDE:</by>  Road metal needs to meet national standards for the longevity of our road network and for insurance purposes. There are quarries in my electorate that have high-quality material available that are not being used.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure and Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy and Mining</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-10-30T14:48:35+10:30" />
        <text id="20241030a373e0a7d47c49c3b0000489">
          <timeStamp time="2024-10-30T14:48:35+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, Minister for Energy and Mining) (14:48):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question and his persistence on behalf of his constituents. Given the member's explanation, I suppose what he's saying is that there are unused quarries within his community, and it's a follow-up really from yesterday's question where I think I did not satisfy his inquiry. It's a matter that goes not only across my agency of infrastructure and transport but also energy and mining, and I did undertake some advice.</text>
        <text id="20241030a373e0a7d47c49c3b0000490">To Mount Monster, the understanding I have is that DIT used materials from this quarry in the seventies and eighties. Energy and mining has advised that there is a mineral claim in place over Mount Monster, and that it met the applicant in June of this year to discuss scoping requirements to inform possible lease applications. I am told—this is the advice I have—that the location faces environmental challenges, including a commonwealth EPBC referral, as there are listed flora and fauna species within and around the mineral area claim. The site is also located within the Mount Monster Conservation Park, and any decision to grant a lease will require dual-minister approval.</text>
        <text id="20241030a373e0a7d47c49c3b0000491">A letter was issued to the applicant in September of this year, which advised of the process to progress a lease application. None of this is to say that there's any gap or impediment, but there are hurdles that this applicant will have to overcome, which is appropriate. I am happy to facilitate further meetings between my department and the proponent, and the local member, about the process of obtaining lease applications but, obviously, it would be done through an independent and rigorous process.</text>
        <text id="20241030a373e0a7d47c49c3b0000492">In relation to the other quarry, Papineau Rocks quarry, it's a fully permitted hard-rock quarry. I am advised, based on production records, it is a small campaign-based operation, which has not yet had any reported production for the last two years. Should this site look to recommence a larger production area, I am advised that the 2005 PEPR, which is in place—which is essentially the program of approved works—needs to be updated.</text>
        <text id="20241030a373e0a7d47c49c3b0000493">So we are not going to accept a 20-year-old PEPR and allow that to be the basis of a brand-new operation, which I think makes sense because we have to maintain social licence across the entire quarrying sector. If you start having carve-outs for one group or another because of the fierce advocacy of their local MP, as opposed to others, that would be unfair. As influential as you are, I just don't think that would be appropriate.</text>
        <page num="9980" />
        <text id="20241030a373e0a7d47c49c3b0000494">Again, I am happy to assist but the proponent would need to meet the independent requirements of my agency before it makes a recommendation to me. Once it has obtained that PEPR, it will then undertake another independent process with Infrastructure and Transport to become prequalified. There is no mechanism, and I would not participate in any mechanism where I bypassed any of these processes to give this organisation any favourable treatment. So I think that's appropriate, and that is the method, I think, which is best serving the state to monitor and administer these quarries.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>