<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2024-09-26T11:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9543" />
  <endPage num="9618" />
  <dateModified time="2024-09-27T16:50:26+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus</name>
      <page num="9574" />
      <text id="20240926957459f98a394c3690000382">
        <heading>Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. TARZIA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-09-26T01:30:00+09:30">
            <name>Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-09-26T14:24:55+09:30" />
        <text id="20240926957459f98a394c3690000383">
          <timeStamp time="2024-09-26T14:24:55+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36">The Hon. V.A. TARZIA (Hartley—Leader of the Opposition) (14:24):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Does the Premier expect the government to make any orders under the Plant Health Act for any other farms and, if so, what will be the impact of those orders on the tomato market?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-09-26T01:30:00+09:30">
            <name>Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-09-26T14:25:07+09:30" />
        <text id="20240926957459f98a394c3690000384">
          <timeStamp time="2024-09-26T14:25:07+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Premier) (14:25):</by>  The government clearly reserves its rights to be able to do that under the act. We don't hope for that, we don't aspire to do that, but the government will make whatever decision is appropriate in order to protect the industry more broadly.</text>
        <text id="20240926957459f98a394c3690000385">Currently—and I invite members not to place too much emphasis on this because it is still early days—the testing that has been undertaken has demonstrated that the virus has only been found at three sites. There have been 2,919 samples taken. I seek to use this occasion to clarify the record. I had my numbers wrong this morning on ABC Radio; I was doing it from memory.</text>
        <text id="20240926957459f98a394c3690000386">The results that we know is that, of the almost 3,000 tests, 50 of those have produced a positive result, but those 50 are all isolated at three particular affected properties. A very significant amount of testing has been undertaken and a lot more will continue to be undertaken, is my advice. Thus far we have every reason to believe that this hasn't extended beyond those three properties, but this is a virus and we know how easily it is able to be transmitted. We monitor it closely. We don't aspire to institute any other orders on facilities, but, of course, we will if that's what is deemed appropriate and necessary.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>