<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2024-09-10T11:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8913" />
  <endPage num="9168" />
  <dateModified time="2024-09-24T14:39:42+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Environment, Resources and Development Committee</name>
      <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004603">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Environment, Resources and Development Committee</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6888" referenceid="1b23b655d40349f8a472b7b9eeba16df" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mr TELFER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Flinders</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-09-10T01:30:00+09:30">
            <name>Environment, Resources and Development Committee</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004604">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="6888" referenceid="1b23b655d40349f8a472b7b9eeba16df">Mr TELFER (Flinders)</by> (26 June 2024).  (Estimates Committee B)</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6889" referenceid="020b6db900d1457ebfe4919753f9c64a" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. N.D. CHAMPION</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Taylor</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-09-10T01:30:00+09:30">
            <name>Environment, Resources and Development Committee</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004605">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="6889" referenceid="020b6db900d1457ebfe4919753f9c64a">The Hon. N.D. CHAMPION (Taylor—Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Housing Infrastructure, Minister for Planning):</by>  I have been advised:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004606">
          <inserted>The Environment, Resources and Development Committee (ERDC) does not have a statutory role in considering amendment regulations (this is a function of the Legislative Review Committee of Parliament, pursuant to the Subordinate Legislation Act 1978) or bills to amend to the Planning, Development and Infrastructure Act 2016 (the PDI Act). </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004607">
          <inserted>However, the ERDC will have a role in considering any amendment to the Planning and Design Code (the code) in accordance with section 74 of the PDI Act. Section 74 of the PDI Act provides for parliamentary scrutiny of designated instruments (which includes the code, regional plans, design standards and state planning policies (SPPs) (with the exception of an SPP associated with a special legislative scheme)).</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004608">
          <inserted>Section 74 of the PDI Act requires me, in my capacity as Minister for Planning, to refer a designated instrument to the ERDC within 28 days of it taking effect. This includes the initial preparation or amendment of a designated instrument. As such, all code amendments carried out in accordance with section 73 of the PDI Act go through this process.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004609">
          <inserted>Upon receipt of the designated instrument, the ERDC must consider whether it has any objections to what is proposed. In considering the designated instrument, the ERDC must pass one of three resolutions:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004610">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Resolve that it does not object to the designated instrument.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004611">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Resolve to suggest amendments to the designated instrument.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004612">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Resolve to object to the designated instrument. </inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004613">
          <inserted>Pursuant to section 74(5) of the PDI Act, if it does not consider the designated instrument within 28 days of receipt, it will be ‘conclusively presumed' the ERDC has no objections.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="9168" />
        <text id="20240910bc9b711baacc46b080004614">
          <inserted>In the event that the ERDC resolves to object to a designated instrument, copies of that designated instrument must be laid before both houses of parliament. Either house of parliament may then pass a motion of disallowance to the designated instrument. </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>