<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2024-08-28T10:30:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8669" />
  <endPage num="8813" />
  <dateModified time="2025-03-27T14:36:02+10:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Grants Administration</name>
      <text id="2024082816e1e2371469417bb0000403">
        <heading>Government Grants Administration</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" kind="question">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-08-28T01:00:00+09:30">
            <name>Government Grants Administration</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-08-28T14:38:14+09:30" />
        <text id="2024082816e1e2371469417bb0000404">
          <timeStamp time="2024-08-28T14:38:14+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c">Mr TEAGUE (Heysen) (14:38):</by>  In light of that answer, a supplementary question: will the Premier guarantee therefore that there have been no other administrative errors in the awarding of grants, and will the government audit recently awarded grants for other administrative errors or the risk thereof?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2024082816e1e2371469417bb0000405">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Member for Heysen, I will take that as a second question. The use of supplementaries is expanding out the number of questions from the opposition, and it is a separate question. Yesterday, the opposition had 19 questions, the Independents had four questions and the government had zero questions. Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2024-08-28T14:38:54+09:30" />
        <page num="8703" />
        <text id="2024082816e1e2371469417bb0000406">
          <timeStamp time="2024-08-28T14:38:54+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Premier) (14:38):</by>  I understand that the analysis that was conducted as part of this evaluation was comprehensive, and I have not received any advice around any other concerns in terms of specific grants that were administered or awarded. In fact, I do note—and I am talking in general terms here—that in terms of the evaluation that was tabled yesterday there were a number of references, and at least one specific reference from the ICAC, to the fact that on their observation that the administration of grants and the like by the state government had been done with complete integrity. There was no finding and no suggestion of any lack of integrity in terms of awardings of the Belgravia grant or otherwise, but there is a robust process in place.</text>
        <text id="2024082816e1e2371469417bb0000407">There is always room for improvement, and that is why these types of evaluations can be valuable to the government. In fact, out of the reports, the various evaluations, five of which were handed down yesterday, some contained specific recommendations in different contexts, not in the context the shadow attorney-general is asking about. Naturally, they are being pursued by the government. I have asked the commissioner for the public sector to look at at least two sets of the recommendations. She has already been charged with those responsibilities formally yesterday, and we look forward to the outcome of that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>