<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2024-04-11T11:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7643" />
  <endPage num="7698" />
  <dateModified time="2024-07-26T14:48:27+09:30" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000248">
      <heading>Bills</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Disability Inclusion (Review Recommendations) Amendment Bill</name>
      <bills>
        <bill id="r5180" referenceid="58eb6a851a0a48ac9bb1ffc8fc4dee1d">
          <name>Disability Inclusion (Review Recommendations) Amendment Bill</name>
        </bill>
      </bills>
      <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000249" referenceid="58eb6a851a0a48ac9bb1ffc8fc4dee1d">
        <heading>Disability Inclusion (Review Recommendations) Amendment Bill</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Committee Stage</name>
        <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000250">
          <heading>Committee Stage</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000251">In committee.</text>
        <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000252">(Continued from 9 April 2024.)</text>
        <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000253">Clause 10.</text>
        <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c">
          <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
          <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000254">
            <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  We just remind ourselves: clause 10 is going to add a new subsection (3) at section 15 that is going to require that a report submitted to the minister for the purposes of subsection (1) must include information about any changes that are recommended to be made to the State Disability Inclusion Plan as a result of the review.</text>
          <page num="7664" />
          <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000255">Just to be clear, the act as it presently stands contains review provisions. I do not recall the section number; I think it is section 32 in part 10 of the act that requires the review we have just seen Richard Dennis undertake—the four-year review. So is it the case then that, like a spacecraft heading off into orbit, we will now jettison section 32 and we will not see therefore any further work for section 32 to do, because that review has occurred?</text>
          <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000256">As I read it, the terms of section 32 require the minister to cause the review of the operation of the act to be conducted, and the review and the report must be completed in the time frame that is described following the commencement of the act and then the minister must cause the report to be laid on the table of both houses. </text>
          <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000257">So as I read section 32 that is a one-off. We therefore have the benefit of Richard Dennis's work, and we are now out on our own, and therefore so far as there is a review to be undertaken then the review of the State Disability Inclusion Plan is going to be the most substantive review exercise that is the subject of the act itself as opposed to any external reform by way of amendment to the act in the broad. Is that a fair understanding of both where we are at in terms of section 32 and now what we are expecting to work with in terms of review of the plan?</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="4978" referenceid="368de1362390438688364d1b4dfc2b82">
          <name>The Hon. N.F. COOK</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Hurtle Vale</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Seniors and Ageing Well</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000258">
            <by role="member" id="4978" referenceid="368de1362390438688364d1b4dfc2b82">The Hon. N.F. COOK:</by>  In a way. Section 32 is the trigger of the once-off review that would happen after implementation, and this is the once-every-four-years review of the state plan.</text>
          <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000259">Progress reported; committee to sit again. </text>
          <text id="20240411437345c3cdef4305b0000260">
            <event>Sitting suspended from 12:59 to 14:00. </event>
          </text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>