<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2024-02-20T11:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6897" />
  <endPage num="6960" />
  <dateModified time="2024-07-25T16:16:02+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Hunter Class Frigate Program</name>
      <page num="6923" />
      <text id="20240220eb0a9173003d4ee490000408">
        <heading>Hunter Class Frigate Program</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" referenceid="40abd06ec15a40b1995c1130588dc41e" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-02-20T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Hunter Class Frigate Program</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-02-20T14:27:04+10:30" />
        <text id="20240220eb0a9173003d4ee490000409">
          <timeStamp time="2024-02-20T14:27:04+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4837" referenceid="40abd06ec15a40b1995c1130588dc41e">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS (Black—Leader of the Opposition) (14:27):</by>  Can the Premier guarantee that there will be at least three of those ships built at Osborne?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2024-02-20T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Hunter Class Frigate Program</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2024-02-20T14:27:14+10:30" />
        <text id="20240220eb0a9173003d4ee490000410">
          <timeStamp time="2024-02-20T14:27:14+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Premier) (14:27):</by>  The commitment from the commonwealth is continuous shipbuilding, so we would anticipate there may be well a lot more than three. I should also make clear that one of the options we know that will be in front of the Navy in contemplating the seventh, eighth and ninth ships will be not just whether or not it's an air warfare destroyer replacement, but also that it may well indeed use the hull, that is the Hunter class hull, as well. We know that BAE have put a platform option on the table to the Navy so that, should they choose, they could potentially have the Hunter class hull, albeit with a different formation in terms of capabilities to be able to accommodate far more vertical launch missile capability than what is provided for in an anti-submarine variant of that particular frigate. These are all the options that are in front of the government.</text>
        <text id="20240220eb0a9173003d4ee490000411">The other thing I should mention that is important is that, on the television we often see the images of people in hi-vis—women and men with trades in the more traditional form: electricians, welders, gasfitters, boilermakers and so forth—but there's actually a huge white-collar workforce that sits behind the blue-collar workforce, and that is as important to our state's economy as it is to the actual shipbuilding effort itself.</text>
        <text id="20240220eb0a9173003d4ee490000412">So the announcement today that the design work on the Hobart class replacement starts at the latter part of this decade actually provides security as well to the white-collar workforce, which is just as important. It is also strategically almost essential in the context of this government's ambition to increase the economic complexity of the state on the back of the shipbuilding effort. So we have to also remind ourselves that it's white-collar as much as blue-collar, and today's announcement provides a platform to provide security for those people into the future as well.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>