<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2024-02-07T10:30:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6757" />
  <endPage num="6826" />
  <dateModified time="2024-07-25T16:01:18+09:30" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000689">
      <heading>Grievance Debate</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Adelaide Hills Transport Services</name>
      <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000690">
        <heading>Adelaide Hills Transport Services</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. TARZIA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <startTime time="2024-02-07T15:10:09+10:30" />
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000691">
          <timeStamp time="2024-02-07T15:10:09+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36">The Hon. V.A. TARZIA (Hartley) (15:10):</by>  Unfortunately, rather than a trial of the Talgo Spanish train going full steam ahead—</text>
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000692">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000693">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. TARZIA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <page num="6801" />
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000694">
          <by role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36">The Hon. V.A. TARZIA:</by>  —what we have here is a trial that is having a bit of a siesta. The reason why it is having a bit of a siesta is because of this Minister for Transport who, quite frankly, must have been asleep in a recent radio interview when he was on the ABC where we learnt about a recent comment and discussion between the minister and also that company in question when he said:</text>
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000695">
          <inserted>When I mentioned that this was a metropolitan service within a city, they all stopped, looked at each other, spoke a few words in Spanish to each other and [looked back and] said, 'well, that's not what our trains do'.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000696">Is that not absolutely amazing? It is amazing for a few reasons: firstly, we know that several representatives from Talgo have actually visited South Australia; but not only that, the minister and many within his department have also actually gone to Spain. We know that they have gone to Spain, we know that they have spent—not $10,000, not $20,000—over $30,000 in taxpayer dollars going and apparently checking out this company.</text>
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000697">For over $30,000 what did they get? Did they get paella? Did they get sangria? Did they get a ticket to run with the bulls? What have they done for over 30 grand? It is just absolutely astonishing—an absolute amateur hour, a complete amateur hour. Before the election, sir, I think even you had the good sense to say things like, 'If the government actually wanted to put a tender together and put it out to the private sector and say, "How would we go about getting a train service to the Adelaide Hills?", they are more within their capability in government now to do that.' But have they done that? Alas, they have not.</text>
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000698">Whilst before the election the minister and his now government vowed to allow this trial with Talgo—which is known, by the way, for its production and distribution of high-speed trains right across major cities—we see, unfortunately, that it has gone on siesta. This is completely baffling. Freedom of information documents that were provided to the opposition show that people like Jesus Rodriguez actually visited Adelaide. At that time, surely these representatives from Talgo would have had the opportunity—I am sure the minister may have even been quite hospitable with them—to take them to actually see the size of Mount Barker, to see the distance from Adelaide to Mount Barker, to see the population from Adelaide to Mount Barker.</text>
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000699">The minister and the department had been in regular communication with Talgo. How could Talgo not have known the apparent purpose of the train service, the size, the population of Mount Barker, until the minister enjoyed, how much: an over $35,000 taxpayer-funded trip to Europe in February 2023? What was the minister actually doing in Madrid? Was he enjoying a siesta himself? Was he enjoying some sangria himself? Was he enjoying the great hospitality of the Spanish people? Who knows? Running with the bulls? I am absolutely bamboozled, as many South Australians are.</text>
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000700">How could you go and spend over $30,000 in taxpayer dollars and not have any answers, and not have any solutions to the congestion. We in Adelaide are the third most congested city in Australia at the moment. The minister needs to explain to the public: why do you have to spend around $35,000 on this trip to Spain if Talgo knew that the purpose of the train was not to their standard?</text>
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000701">Talgo visited South Australia in 2022. Why did they not say from the start that that is not what their trains do? This would have saved South Australian taxpayers over $30,000. Mr Rodriguez did not just visit Adelaide in 2022. From our records, he was also at the meeting with the minister in Madrid in February 2023. So I will be intrigued to see who blamed who in that meeting. I would love to have been a fly on the wall as those discussions were taking place. How can Jesus not have communicated to other Talgo executives? The minister and Mr Rodriguez not only held meetings in Madrid, but they also went on a factory tour. They attended meetings with the minister and the Spanish Ministry of Industry. As I said, this is absolutely amazing stuff.</text>
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000702">After the minister and his department spend over $35,000 on business class airfares, trips, flights, accommodation—you name it—the minister has very little to show for it. Do you know what I say to that, sir? Well, I say this: la gente esta loca.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2024020764bfdfe0836a4d69b0000703">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  It's my favourite topic.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>