<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2023-10-31T11:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5849" />
  <endPage num="5927" />
  <dateModified time="2024-07-25T11:15:53+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Defence Naval Shipbuilding</name>
      <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000390">
        <heading>Defence Naval Shipbuilding</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" referenceid="40abd06ec15a40b1995c1130588dc41e" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-10-31T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Defence Naval Shipbuilding</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-10-31T14:12:54+10:30" />
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000391">
          <timeStamp time="2023-10-31T14:12:54+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4837" referenceid="40abd06ec15a40b1995c1130588dc41e">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS (Black—Leader of the Opposition) (14:12):</by>  My question is again to the Premier. Is the Premier aware of the recommendations of the special report produced by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute and, if so, does he agree with them? With your leave, sir, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000392">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" referenceid="40abd06ec15a40b1995c1130588dc41e" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000393">
          <by role="member" id="4837" referenceid="40abd06ec15a40b1995c1130588dc41e">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS:</by>  On 30 October 2023 the Australian Strategic Policy Institute published a special report, 'An Australian maritime strategy: resourcing The Royal Australian Navy'. Recommendation six in that report is, and I quote:</text>
        <page num="5877" />
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000394">
          <inserted>…the planned production of nine [anti-submarine warfare] frigates should be reduced to six...the remaining ships should be replaced by multipurpose frigates or destroyers with greater missile capacity to support the [Defence Strategic Review]...</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2023-10-31T14:13:45+10:30" />
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000395">
          <timeStamp time="2023-10-31T14:13:45+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Premier) (14:13):</by>  No, I haven't had the chance to read ASPI's report that was released yesterday. ASPI is a significant contributor to the public policy debate around defence and our nation's posture in a range of geopolitical policy frames, and I acknowledge their work.</text>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000396">In respect of the advocacy around a reduction from nine Hunter class frigates to six, I don't imagine ASPI have been unique in proposing such an option. I am sure there are a range of options in front of the commonwealth around what to do in terms of the number of Hunter class frigates.</text>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000397">What is critical here to the state's interest and, we would argue, for the national interest is that there is the continuity of serious surface shipbuilding here in South Australia. Whether the commonwealth commits to six or nine Hunter frigates—and naturally six or nine is a long way down the track—whatever the commonwealth decides, what we will be arguing for fervently, and holding the government to account on rigorously, is making sure we have continuous, serious surface ship production here in South Australia, happening side by side with the delivery of the nuclear submarine program.</text>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000398">The Leader of the Opposition is welcome and should be acknowledged for his reference to outside advocacy from significant organisations like ASPI. I am also very aware that over the course of the last few days we have other significant Australians advocate positions in regard to shipbuilding capacity in our state. I acknowledge that none other than senior Liberal Alexander Downer is saying that we shouldn't be building nuclear submarines in South Australia—a senior Liberal saying that this program is a white elephant and a form of pork-barrelling.</text>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000399">I reject that view. Alexander Downer, I believe, to be wrong. I think in South Australia we do have the ambition and the capability to build nuclear submarines right here in our state. I think these are thousands of jobs—</text>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000400">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000401">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order! The Premier has the call.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000402">
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS:</by>  I believe that these are thousands of jobs that will be developed not just in our state's interest but in the national interest. There is nowhere else in our country or within our federation that possesses the skills and know-how to be able to build—</text>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000403">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000404">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Member for Taylor!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000405">
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS:</by>  —a world-class fleet for a Navy that seeks to protect—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000406">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Member for Hartley!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000407">
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS:</by>  —our interests as best as we do. I reject the former senior Liberal's view on this matter.</text>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000408">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22">The Hon. A. Koutsantonis interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000409">
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS:</by>  No, he is a senior Liberal. I reject his view resoundingly. I believe him to be wrong, and I look forward to witnessing hopefully a bipartisan view—</text>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000410">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000411">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Member for Morialta! Member for Schubert!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20231031d3caa795561b4ca280000412">
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS:</by>  —that is unqualified, that Alexander Downer is fundamentally wrong.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>