<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2023-10-19T11:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5785" />
  <endPage num="5847" />
  <dateModified time="2024-07-24T15:28:51+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Verdun Interchange</name>
      <text id="2023101980eb29b059194686b0000618">
        <heading>Verdun Interchange</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" kind="question">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-10-19T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Verdun Interchange</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-10-19T14:59:40+10:30" />
        <text id="2023101980eb29b059194686b0000619">
          <timeStamp time="2023-10-19T14:59:40+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c">Mr TEAGUE (Heysen) (14:59):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Regional Roads. Will the minister commit to delivering the Verdun interchange upgrade and, if so, when?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure and Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy and Mining</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-10-19T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Verdun Interchange</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-10-19T14:59:51+10:30" />
        <text id="2023101980eb29b059194686b0000620">
          <timeStamp time="2023-10-19T14:59:51+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, Minister for Energy and Mining) (14:59):</by>  The Verdun interchange and the Mount Barker interchange are part of a package that the state government is delivering with the commonwealth government as a package of projects that are being committed through what was then labelled by the previous government as the Hahndorf package. That package is under review by the commonwealth government, as well as other packages across the nation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. Tarzia</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <text id="2023101980eb29b059194686b0000621">
          <by role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36">The Hon. V.A. Tarzia:</by>  Still!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure and Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy and Mining</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="2023101980eb29b059194686b0000622">
          <by role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Yes, the 90-day review into its 121<sup>st</sup> day is going well. The federal infrastructure review is looking at a lot of infrastructure across the country. As far as I can tell, the reason this review has been commissioned is a failure of the previous Liberal government and the previous commonwealth government for leading projects that were undercosted, inadequately prepared and overpromised. They were overpromised to the extent that the previous commonwealth government and the previous Marshall government promised projects that they simply could not deliver within the budgets and frameworks that they had announced.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. Tarzia</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <text id="2023101980eb29b059194686b0000623">
          <by role="member" id="4840" referenceid="7be4bfb1b1dd4eaaae45edf2f9c24e36">The Hon. V.A. Tarzia:</by>  They were ambitious.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure and Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy and Mining</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <page num="5823" />
        <text id="2023101980eb29b059194686b0000624">
          <by role="member" id="633" referenceid="daab39c192204b0f88930f68be57ad22">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Ambition is one word you could use for it; stupid is another, but I suppose members opposite can choose which one they like. Promising something you know you can't deliver is not generally wise or ambitious. It's not quite Kennedyesque saying, 'We choose to go to the moon, not because it is easy, but because it is hard.' It is more like, 'We think we can build this bridge for beans and mirrors,' versus it actually costing money.</text>
        <text id="2023101980eb29b059194686b0000625">I look forward to the outcome but, as far as the state government is concerned, we think the Verdun interchange is a good outcome and it is an important outcome. The Mount Barker interchange is an important piece of work that should be done. We look forward to doing it, but unfortunately the Hahndorf package that was announced by the previous government is simply undeliverable in its current package form.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>