<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2023-08-29T11:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4711" />
  <endPage num="4876" />
  <dateModified time="2024-06-17T15:31:59+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>APY Art Centre Collective</name>
      <text id="202308297a6b9139ff26496db0000532">
        <heading>APY Art Centre Collective</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" referenceid="98bc9886f8ef4f70897848c1d1c59c00" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-08-29T01:30:00+09:30">
            <name>APY Art Centre Collective</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-08-29T14:41:22+09:30" />
        <text id="202308297a6b9139ff26496db0000533">
          <timeStamp time="2023-08-29T14:41:22+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4343" referenceid="98bc9886f8ef4f70897848c1d1c59c00">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER (Morialta—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:41):</by>  Supplementary: in relation to the minister's answer and the National Gallery review, has the minister read the National Gallery review and will she give consideration to reducing the scope of the terms of reference of her review to remove anything that has already been considered by the National Gallery review?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5572" referenceid="8d5fbcb4f22e401a94a6418aed69abc2" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. MICHAELS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small and Family Business</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-08-29T01:30:00+09:30">
            <name>APY Art Centre Collective</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-08-29T14:41:39+09:30" />
        <text id="202308297a6b9139ff26496db0000534">
          <timeStamp time="2023-08-29T14:41:39+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5572" referenceid="8d5fbcb4f22e401a94a6418aed69abc2">The Hon. A. MICHAELS (Enfield—Minister for Small and Family Business, Minister for Consumer and Business Affairs, Minister for Arts) (14:41):</by>  I thank the member for the question. The National Gallery review looked at the provenance of the 28 paintings that were to be going into their exhibition; it was quite narrow. I have read the review. I have had a briefing with Nick Mitzevich as well. I have asked the panel to get in touch with the reviewers who were involved in that. I understand there was further evidence that wasn't made public in that report, that I don't have access to either, but I think there is some evidence there that might flow into the terms of reference that we have given.</text>
        <text id="202308297a6b9139ff26496db0000535">In terms of making it narrower, I think it's really important that we do look at the broader issues around how those artists and art workers have been treated, if any of those broader allegations in fact are true around the governance of the APY Art Centre Collective, so I am reluctant to narrow it only to have a result of what we have now with the NGA report, which is it hasn't really dampened anyone's concerns about First Nations art and how it's produced certainly in the APY Art Centre Collective but also having that flow-on effect nationally.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>