<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2023-06-28T10:30:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4519" />
  <endPage num="4637" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T09:07:43+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>University Merger</name>
      <text id="202306280039a139ba9e4961a0000388">
        <heading>University Merger</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" referenceid="40abd06ec15a40b1995c1130588dc41e" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-06-28T01:00:00+09:30">
            <name>University Merger</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-06-28T14:07:25+09:30" />
        <text id="202306280039a139ba9e4961a0000389">
          <timeStamp time="2023-06-28T14:07:25+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4837" referenceid="40abd06ec15a40b1995c1130588dc41e">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS (Black—Leader of the Opposition) (14:07):</by>  My question is again to the Premier. Can the Premier advise the house what cost-benefit analysis has informed the government's current plan to pursue a university merger? With your leave, sir, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="202306280039a139ba9e4961a0000390">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" referenceid="40abd06ec15a40b1995c1130588dc41e" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="202306280039a139ba9e4961a0000391">
          <by role="member" id="4837" referenceid="40abd06ec15a40b1995c1130588dc41e">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS:</by>  The Labor Party's election commitment was to establish a university merger commission which would explore the risks and costs as well as the benefits and opportunities of a realignment of our tertiary institutions. After the election, the government instead entered into direct negotiations with Adelaide University and the University of South Australia.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2023-06-28T14:08:09+09:30" />
        <text id="202306280039a139ba9e4961a0000392">
          <timeStamp time="2023-06-28T14:08:09+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Premier) (14:08):</by>  I thank the Leader of the Opposition for his question. I do want to thank the opposition for their interest in this subject matter because it is of material significance to the state.</text>
        <page num="4548" />
        <text id="202306280039a139ba9e4961a0000393">The work that has been undertaken over the course of the last six months is being led by the universities themselves. Naturally, there has been engagement with the state government, given that we have a substantial interest in the policy outcome, but each university, in conjunction with each other but also, crucially, independently of each other, has been undertaking their own work around the cost-benefit analysis of the creation of a new university between both Adelaide and the University of South Australia.</text>
        <text id="202306280039a139ba9e4961a0000394">It is important that each university council forms a view consistent with the best interests of those institutions individually, but it's also important, and I think appropriate, that those institutions think about the long-term interests of the state has a whole, which is our only consideration in terms of government.</text>
        <text id="202306280039a139ba9e4961a0000395">Naturally, we have a different imperative from what they may have individually. Nonetheless, if the University of South Australia—and it is an 'if'; there are active deliberations underway at the moment—and the University of Adelaide independently arrive at their own view that the creation of a new university is in the interests of those institutions and their students, as well as in the interests of the state, then clearly that is something we would wholeheartedly support.</text>
        <text id="202306280039a139ba9e4961a0000396">We announced that we were putting the university amalgamation commission on hold upon receipt of the news that those two universities were engaging with each other and undertaking that work. I am happy to say publicly that we understand both universities have done their own business cases, have done their own active consultation and have done their own very deliberate analyses that will be the subject of review and then subsequently a decision from those two university councils, and the government awaits the outcome of that endeavour.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>