<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2023-02-07T11:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2705" />
  <endPage num="2770" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T08:48:53+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Department Chief Executive</name>
      <text id="20230207b86daa3184564f79b0000409">
        <heading>Child Protection Department Chief Executive</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" kind="question">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2023-02-07T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Child Protection Department Chief Executive</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2023-02-07T15:19:48+10:30" />
        <text id="20230207b86daa3184564f79b0000410">
          <timeStamp time="2023-02-07T15:19:48+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c">Mr TEAGUE (Heysen) (15:19):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Is the Premier satisfied that the remuneration on offer for the new chief executive of the Department for Child Protection will attract the best possible candidate? With your leave, sir, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="20230207b86daa3184564f79b0000411">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <text id="20230207b86daa3184564f79b0000412">
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  The chief executive of the Department for Child Protection earns up to $382,932, yet the chief executive of the Office of Hydrogen Power South Australia, Sam Crafter, is paid $560,788.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2023-02-07T15:20:16+10:30" />
        <text id="20230207b86daa3184564f79b0000413">
          <timeStamp time="2023-02-07T15:20:16+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Premier) (15:20):</by>  I think I have the ability to say, in this place, that I understand that the former government wasn't always attracted to the idea of paying the former chief executive of child protection a higher remuneration, so I acknowledge their change of position in that regard.</text>
        <text id="20230207b86daa3184564f79b0000414">Nonetheless, the state government is committed to employing the best possible people that we can recruit to senior chief executive positions. That is certainly true for the officeholder of the chief executive of the Department for Child Protection, and although I acknowledge the advocacy of the shadow minister to drive up the price as best as he possibly can for us to recruit the best possible person, we do remain flexible to respond to the market's needs.</text>
        <page num="2734" />
        <text id="20230207b86daa3184564f79b0000415">As is always the case, when we identify the best person for the job we also then go on to negotiation with them around their remuneration and their salary. But the simple fact is this: as I stated on the very first day that the news of Ms Taylor's resignation came to light, this was going to be a difficult undertaking. I think I foreshadowed on that first announcement that the Victorian government was also in the market for the chief executive, as the shadow minister has referred to publicly more recently as well. So we have to do our level best; we have to be competitive in a difficult market, and we have every intention to do that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>