<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2022-11-17T11:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2407" />
  <endPage num="2478" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T08:45:54+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Aluminium Composite Cladding</name>
      <text id="202211171c800046c53946ed90000659">
        <heading>Aluminium Composite Cladding</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" kind="question">
        <name>Mr BATTY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-11-17T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Aluminium Composite Cladding</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-11-17T14:56:17+10:30" />
        <text id="202211171c800046c53946ed90000660">
          <timeStamp time="2022-11-17T14:56:17+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa">Mr BATTY (Bragg) (14:56):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Planning. Has the government determined what buildings are eligible for its recently announced limited loan scheme for the removal of dangerous flammable cladding? With your leave, sir, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="202211171c800046c53946ed90000661">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr BATTY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <text id="202211171c800046c53946ed90000662">
          <by role="member" id="6982" referenceid="3d5cb79b4d454cc980b2842cae5afaaa">Mr BATTY:</by>  The 95-word announcement of this policy on the department's website suggests the scheme is only available for high or extreme risk rated buildings, despite other risk rated buildings also having received demands from council building fire safety committees to remove the dangerous cladding.</text>
        <text id="202211171c800046c53946ed90000663">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202211171c800046c53946ed90000664">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order! Member for Bragg, before I turn to the minister I might observe that by suggesting a particular interpretation to a series of words on a website, we again confront the difficulty that arises in relation to the standing orders when we have in mind the introduction of facts. To suggest something of course invites an argument or opinion. I'm going to allow the question on this occasion.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6889" referenceid="020b6db900d1457ebfe4919753f9c64a" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. N.D. CHAMPION</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Taylor</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Trade and Investment</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2022-11-17T14:57:57+10:30" />
        <text id="202211171c800046c53946ed90000665">
          <timeStamp time="2022-11-17T14:57:57+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6889" referenceid="020b6db900d1457ebfe4919753f9c64a">The Hon. N.D. CHAMPION (Taylor—Minister for Trade and Investment, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Planning) (14:57):</by>  For the purposes of clarity, I inform the member that loans will be automatically eligible for those in the extreme and high-risk category, and on a case-by-case basis in the moderate category.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>